Clicky

Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
34
Features
51
Overall
40

Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2010
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Announced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

In this write-up, we are analyzing the Canon A495 and Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is fairly similar but the A495 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The A495 was manufactured 12 months prior to the XZ-1 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the A495 matches up versus the XZ-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Olympus XZ-1

 A495 XZ-1 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Canon A495

 XZ-1 A495 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011January 2010More recent by 12 months
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution614k115kCrisper display (+499k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Olympus XZ-1

 A495 XZ-1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon A495 has got outside measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon A495 and Olympus XZ-1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the A495 and the XZ-1.

Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and XZ-1 is 93 and 88 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing specs. The graphic here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the A495 and XZ-1.

All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The A495 features the tinier sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field trickier. The older A495 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 Portrait photography features
Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography features
19
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
44
has manual focus
offers face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.63")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Canon A495 Street photography features
Olympus XZ-1 Street photography features
46
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/1.63")
more heavy than competitors in class (275g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon A495
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-1
16
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
great battery (320 per charge)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.63")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Travel photography camera
50
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
62
great battery (320 shots)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (275 grams)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Landscape photography camera
22
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
54
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
great battery (320 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.63")
no Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging details
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging details
21
wide angle not great (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic support
31
quite wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (275g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Olympus XZ-1
 Canon PowerShot A495Olympus XZ-1
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Olympus XZ-1
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-01-05 2011-01-26
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.63"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 3664 x 2752
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 9 11
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 115 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 gr (0.39 lb) 275 gr (0.61 lb)
Dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 34
DXO Color Depth score not tested 18.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.4
DXO Low light score not tested 117
Other
Battery life - 320 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model 2 x AA Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $109 $567