Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Canon A495 and Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is fairly similar but the A495 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A495 was manufactured 12 months prior to the XZ-1 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the A495 matches up versus the XZ-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A495 and Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are provided at Canon A495 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Olympus XZ-1
| A495 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Canon A495
| XZ-1 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 | January 2010 | More recent by 12 months | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 115k | Crisper display (+499k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Olympus XZ-1
| A495 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon A495 has got outside measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon A495 and Olympus XZ-1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the A495 and the XZ-1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and XZ-1 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing specs. The graphic here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the A495 and XZ-1.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The A495 features the tinier sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field trickier. The older A495 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lb) | 275 gr (0.61 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $109 | $567 |