Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below, we are comparing the Canon A495 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar but the A495 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe A495 was launched 3 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the A495 grades against the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A495 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| A495 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Canon A495
| XZ-2 iHS | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 35 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+805k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| A495 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon A495 has physical dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check out the Canon A495 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the A495 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and XZ-2 iHS is 93 and 85 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading a spec sheet. The graphic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the A495 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The A495 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older A495 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Canon A495 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-05 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lb) | 346 grams (0.76 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $109 | $450 |
