Canon A495 vs Panasonic FH22
Portability
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Canon A495 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
Canon A495
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2010
Panasonic FH22
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS33
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon A495 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Canon A495 and Panasonic FH22, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Canon and Panasonic. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and FH22 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A495 was unveiled at a similar time to the FH22 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the A495 matches up vs the FH22 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A495 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A495 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The full galleries are viewable at Canon A495 Gallery & Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Panasonic FH22
| A495 | FH22 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Canon A495
| FH22 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Panasonic FH22
| A495 | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | January 2010 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Canon A495 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon A495 enjoys physical measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Panasonic FH22 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Canon A495 and Panasonic FH22 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the A495 versus the FH22.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and FH22 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the A495 and FH22.
Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Panasonic FH22 to provide extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively.
Canon A495 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon A495 Portrait photography info
Panasonic FH22 Portrait photography info
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Canon A495 Street photography factors
Panasonic FH22 Street photography factors
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides focus via touch
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon A495
Sports photography with Panasonic FH22
max frames per second low (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
slow fps (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon A495
Travel photography with Panasonic FH22
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
provides focus via touch
decent megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse function
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon A495
Landscape photography with Panasonic FH22
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.5")
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Canon A495 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FH22 as a Vlogging camera
wide angle not great (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic jack
reasonably wide (28mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon A495 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Panasonic |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 pounds) | 170 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $109 | $200 |