Canon A495 vs Pentax MX-1
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Canon A495 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Released July 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A495 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the Canon A495 versus Pentax MX-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Pentax. The image resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is pretty similar but the A495 (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") come with different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe A495 was manufactured 4 years prior to the MX-1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the A495 scores versus the MX-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A495 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A495 & Pentax MX-1. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon A495 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Pentax MX-1
| A495 | MX-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Canon A495
| MX-1 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 42 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Pentax MX-1
| A495 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Canon A495 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon A495 features exterior dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Pentax MX-1 has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A495 versus Pentax MX-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the A495 and the MX-1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and MX-1 is 93 and 84 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The visual here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the A495 and MX-1.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The A495 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Pentax MX-1 will offer you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older A495 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon A495 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon A495 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Pentax |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Pentax MX-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-05 | 2013-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lb) | 391g (0.86 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 208 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-Li-106 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $109 | $400 |