Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-1
93 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
93 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Canon A495 and Pentax WG-1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Pentax. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and WG-1 (14MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A495 was released 13 months prior to the WG-1 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the A495 scores versus the WG-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A495 & Pentax Optio WG-1. The complete galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery & Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Pentax WG-1
| A495 | WG-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Canon A495
| WG-1 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2011 | January 2010 | Newer by 13 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Pentax WG-1
| A495 | WG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Canon A495 enjoys external dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-1 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Canon A495 and Pentax WG-1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the A495 vs the WG-1.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and WG-1 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The pic below will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and WG-1.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-1 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged A495 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Pentax |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-05 | 2011-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 pounds) | 157g (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $109 | $350 |