Clicky

Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-3

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Pentax WG-3 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Pentax WG-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Revealed July 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview

Following is a complete review of the Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Pentax. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and WG-3 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The A495 was launched 4 years earlier than the WG-3 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the A495 matches up against the WG-3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Pentax WG-3

 A495 WG-3 

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Canon A495

 WG-3 A495 
RevealedJuly 2013January 2010More modern by 43 months
Manually focus More precise focusing
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k115kClearer display (+345k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Pentax WG-3

 A495 WG-3 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon A495 comes with outer measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Compare the Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the A495 and the WG-3.

Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-3 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and WG-3 is 93 and 90 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-3 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out specifications. The picture below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the A495 and WG-3.

To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Pentax WG-3 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged A495 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-3 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 as a Portrait photography camera
Pentax WG-3 as a Portrait photography camera
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
no external flash support
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
41
focusing manually
MP count decent (16MP)
comes with face detect focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Canon A495 Street photography factors
Pentax WG-3 Street photography factors
46
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon A495
Sports photography with Pentax WG-3
16
max fps very slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
weather proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (240 shots)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 as a Travel photography camera
Pentax WG-3 as a Travel photography camera
50
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
MP count low (10MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (37mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
72
weather proofing
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
bad battery power (240 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 as a Landscape photography camera
Pentax WG-3 as a Landscape photography camera
22
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (37mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
54
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
bad battery power (240 CIPA)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging info
Pentax WG-3 Vlogging info
21
wide angle not the best (37mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone jack
36
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon A495 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Pentax WG-3
 Canon PowerShot A495Pentax WG-3
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Pentax
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Pentax WG-3
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Revealed 2010-01-05 2013-07-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 80 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 115 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.40 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 gr (0.39 lb) 230 gr (0.51 lb)
Physical dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 pictures
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model 2 x AA D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $109 $300