Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-4
93 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Canon A495 versus Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe A495 was brought out 5 years prior to the WG-4 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the A495 matches up vs the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A495 & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon A495 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Ricoh WG-4
| A495 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Canon A495
| WG-4 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | January 2010 | Fresher by 49 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 115k | Clearer display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Ricoh WG-4
| A495 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon A495 features exterior dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Canon A495 versus Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the A495 versus the WG-4.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and WG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing technical specs. The photograph below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and WG-4.
As you can tell, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to provide you with more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The older A495 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $109 | $330 |