Clicky

Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-70

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Ricoh WG-70 front
Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41

Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Announced January 2010
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Launched February 2020
  • Updated by Ricoh WG-80
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview

Here is a comprehensive overview of the Canon A495 versus Ricoh WG-70, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The A495 was revealed 11 years prior to the WG-70 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the A495 matches up versus the WG-70 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Ricoh WG-70

 A495 WG-70 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Canon A495

 WG-70 A495 
LaunchedFebruary 2020January 2010Fresher by 122 months
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k115kCrisper display (+115k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Ricoh WG-70

 A495 WG-70 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Canon A495 comes with external measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Analyze the Canon A495 versus Ricoh WG-70 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the A495 against the WG-70.

Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A495 and WG-70 is 93 and 91 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and WG-70.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-70 to offer extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The older A495 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography highlights
19
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
42
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
no manual control
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Canon A495 Street photography advice
Ricoh WG-70 Street photography advice
46
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
62
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proof
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Canon A495 Sports photography advice
Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography advice
16
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
50
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proof
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon A495
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-70
50
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse function
resolution not great (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
71
environment proof
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Landscape photography camera
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
49
you can focus manually
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
environment proof
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Vlogging camera
21
wide angle not great (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external microphone socket
33
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
includes face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon A495 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Ricoh WG-70
 Canon PowerShot A495Ricoh WG-70
General Information
Company Canon Ricoh
Model type Canon PowerShot A495 Ricoh WG-70
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Announced 2010-01-05 2020-02-04
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 37-122mm (3.3x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 115k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync On, off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175g (0.39 lbs) 193g (0.43 lbs)
Physical dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $109 $280