Clicky

Canon A495 vs Sony W230

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
25
Overall
30

Canon A495 vs Sony W230 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2010
Sony W230
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • 156g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Revealed February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon A495 vs Sony W230 Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Canon A495 versus Sony W230, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Canon and Sony. The sensor resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the W230 (12MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The A495 was manufactured 11 months later than the W230 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the A495 scores versus the W230 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Sony W230

 A495 W230 
RevealedJanuary 2010February 2009More recent by 11 months

Reasons to pick Sony W230 over the Canon A495

 W230 A495 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k115kClearer display (+115k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Sony W230

 A495 W230 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Canon A495 vs Sony W230 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Canon A495 comes with exterior measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Sony W230 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check the Canon A495 versus Sony W230 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the A495 versus the W230.

Canon A495 vs Sony W230 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and W230 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Sony W230 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Sony W230 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through specs. The visual underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and W230.

All in all, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Sony W230 to result in more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more recent A495 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon A495 vs Sony W230 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Sony W230 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Sony W230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 Portrait photography advice
Sony W230 Portrait photography advice
19
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
27
has manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon A495 Street photography information
Sony W230 Street photography information
46
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Canon A495 Sports photography features
Sony W230 Sports photography features
16
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 Travel photography info
Sony W230 Travel photography info
50
flash built-in
no Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (37mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
51
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (30mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon A495
Landscape photography with Sony W230
22
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (37mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
36
has manual focus
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (30mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging advice
Sony W230 Vlogging advice
21
wide angle not the best (37mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic support
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (30mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon A495 vs Sony W230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Sony W230
 Canon PowerShot A495Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230
General Information
Brand Canon Sony
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-01-05 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 30-120mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focus range 1cm 4cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 115 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 1 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 1.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.90 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175g (0.39 lbs) 156g (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $109 $180