Canon A800 vs Olympus XZ-1

Here, we will be reviewing the Canon A800 versus Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the A800 (10MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is pretty similar but the A800 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") boast totally different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The A800 was brought out at a similar time to the XZ-1 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the A800 matches up vs the XZ-1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A800 and Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are provided at Canon A800 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.

If you're planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon A800 has exterior dimensions of 94mm x 61mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 186 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Compare the Canon A800 versus Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the A800 compared to the XZ-1.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A800 and XZ-1 is 93 and 88 respectively.

Quite often, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A800 and XZ-1.

As you have seen, the two cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The A800 contains the tinier sensor which will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult.