Canon D20 vs Samsung TL220
91 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
95 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Canon D20 vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.8) lens
- 228g - 112 x 71 x 28mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Alternative Name is ST500
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon PowerShot D20 vs Samsung TL220: A Hands-On Comparative Deep Dive for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing the right compact camera is often a balancing act between features, image quality, ruggedness, and price. Today, I’m comparing two somewhat niche but interesting compacts from the late 2000s and early 2010s era: the Canon PowerShot D20, a rugged, waterproof compact aimed at outdoor enthusiasts, and the Samsung TL220 (also known as ST500), a sleek, stylish compact with a decent zoom range for everyday shooting. Despite being several years old now, these cameras each bring distinct value propositions that still resonate with different types of photographers - whether you’re a weekend adventurer, a casual snapper, or a cheapskate looking for solid image quality on a budget.
I’ve spent extensive hands-on time testing both cameras in a variety of conditions over the years, dissecting their sensor capabilities, autofocus systems, usability, and overall performance. This article will guide you through their strengths and weaknesses across all major photography disciplines - from portraiture to wildlife, science-grade astro to the bustling streets - so you can figure out which compact fits your specific needs today.
Before we jump into the nitty-gritty, let’s first take a look at their physical designs and ergonomics.
Size and Handling: Rugged Bulk vs. Sleek Compactness
When it comes to camera handling, size and grip often dictate not only comfort but also shooting style and stability. The Canon D20 is designed with an emphasis on toughness and usability in harsh environments, while the Samsung TL220 is built to be slim, sleek, and pocketable.

Canon D20: The D20 measures a chunky 112 x 71 x 28 mm and weighs 228 grams - not exactly featherlight for a compact, but its body features reinforced environmental sealing, including waterproofing down to 10 meters, freezeproofing, and shock resistance. This means you can hand it to a scuba diver, a snowshoer, or a mid-waterfall hiker with confidence. The textured grips and chunky buttons are designed for gloves or wet fingers, although it’s not exactly stylish for everyday city strolls.
Samsung TL220: The TL220 is noticeably slimmer at 100 x 60 x 19 mm and weighs just 169 grams. It’s got that minimal, modern look with smooth lines and a touchscreen - making it more travel-friendly and less conspicuous for street or candid shooting. The downside: zero weather sealing, so you’ll need to baby it in any inclement conditions.
Handling-wise, the D20’s size and weight translate to better stability when shooting telephoto or macro, while the TL220’s compactness wins points for portability - especially for pocket loading on the go.
Design and Control Layout: Clarity and Usability in the Field
Once you pick up a camera, the intuitive placement of controls can make or break your shooting experience.

The Canon D20 opts for straightforward physical buttons and a mode dial - no touchscreen here - which pairs well with the rugged outdoorsy theme. There’s no optical or electronic viewfinder, so you’ll be relying entirely on the rear fixed LCD screen. The buttons aren’t backlit, but they’re large and spaced out enough to avoid fumbling in challenging lighting or gloved hands.
Samsung’s TL220 sports a touchscreen interface alongside physical controls. The touchscreen makes menu navigation quick and intuitive for casual users but can be sluggish in bright sunlight or cold weather. It also lacks dedicated dials for aperture or shutter priority modes, limiting creative manual control.
While both cameras are aimed at the point-and-shoot market segment, the Canon leans more toward rugged practicality, and the Samsung plays up on simplicity and sleekness.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: CMOS vs. CCD Showdown
At the heart of any camera is the sensor, a major determinant of image detail, dynamic range, noise performance, and overall image quality.

Both cameras share a 1/2.3-inch sensor size, approximately 6 x 4.5 mm in dimensions. However, the Canon utilizes a 12MP CMOS sensor coupled with Canon’s reliable Digic 4 image processor, whereas the Samsung uses a 12MP CCD sensor, a common choice in earlier compacts but somewhat dated compared to CMOS tech.
In practical terms, CMOS sensors like those in the D20 generally offer better noise control at high ISOs, faster readout speeds, and improved power efficiency. This translates to better performance in low light and generally cleaner images overall.
The Samsung’s CCD sensor, by contrast, produces pleasing color reproduction, especially under controlled lighting, and occasionally churns out slightly smoother gradations in highlights, but it trips up once you push ISO sensitivity, showing more noticeable noise and softness.
Image samples side-by-side (see below) reveal this nuanced difference: the Canon D20 delivers cleaner shadows and better contrast, while the Samsung TL220’s images can appear a bit milky or flat in tricky lighting.
Viewing and Interface: Fixed LCD Technology Comparison
Neither camera offers a viewfinder, meaning reliance on the LCD screen is 100%. How the screens perform affects framing accuracy and user comfort.

The Canon D20 sports a 3-inch PureColor II TFT LCD panel with a resolution of 461k dots - fairly sharp and bright for its time. The screen is fixed and not a touchscreen, but due to the solid brightness and decent contrast, it’s usable even under direct sunlight when you increase brightness settings.
Samsung’s TL220 also has a 3-inch LCD but with a lower resolution of 230k dots. Its touchscreen functionality compensates somewhat for lower sharpness, offering direct access to menus and focus points, but the display struggles under bright ambient light with reflections and glare.
From my experience, unless you’re a die-hard touchscreen fan, the higher resolution on the Canon makes it the more practical choice for reliable framing in varied lighting. Plus, the D20’s lack of touchscreen actually prevents overlooking buttons or menus during waterfalls or rugged use, when gloves or wet hands might cause errant screen taps.
Autofocus and Speed: Nailing the Moment
Both cameras feature contrast-detection autofocus systems common in their class and eras, but they differ in sophistication and versatility.
The Canon D20 offers 9 autofocus points, including face detection, which effectively helps in portrait situations and everyday scenes with people. While the autofocus isn’t blazing fast like today’s mirrorless giants, it’s reliable in good light, and the optical image stabilization helps minimize motion blur with slower shutter speeds.
The Samsung TL220 has no dedicated number for autofocus points, relying more on a center-weighted approach and lacks face detection. Its touchscreen AF allows you to tap to focus, but the system is more prone to hunting, especially in low light or complex scenes. Also, it does not support continuous AF - meaning it’s less confident tracking moving subjects.
For wildlife and sports photography, neither is ideal, but the Canon D20’s continuous AF mode and slightly better focus accuracy make it marginally ahead. Neither supports advanced tracking or phase-detect points, so fast action photography remains outside their league.
Shooting in Various Genres: What Works Best Where?
Now, let’s dissect the cameras’ real-world suitability across ten photography disciplines:
Portrait Photography
The Canon D20’s face detection and 9 AF points provide decent subject recognition, yielding sharp eyes and natural skin tones with its CMOS sensor. The 28-140 mm zoom with a maximum aperture of F3.9-4.8 offers mild, usable background separation, although don’t expect dreamy bokeh. The Samsung’s maximum aperture is a little slower (F3.5-5.9), and lacking face detection, it struggles to nail focus on faces quickly in all conditions.
Winner: Canon D20
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters prize dynamic range and high resolution. Though both cameras have 12 MP sensors, the Canon’s CMOS tech produces slightly better dynamic range and less noise in shadows. Weather sealing gives the D20 a massive advantage outdoors - rain, dust, or splash won’t have you ducking for cover.
Samsung TL220’s lack of weather sealing and noisier CCD sensor under harsher conditions make it less suited here.
Winner: Canon D20
Wildlife Photography
Neither camera is a wildlife powerhouse, but tracking and burst rate matter.
The Canon D20’s continuous AF mode helps maintain focus on slow-moving animals, with optical stabilization assisting telephoto sharpness. However, it lacks fast burst shooting, and autofocus is not professional level.
Samsung TL220 can’t do continuous AF and has no burst mode worth mentioning.
Winner: Canon D20
Sports Photography
Sports demands speed and low light prowess. With a max shutter speed of 1/1600s, the Canon D20 is faster than Samsung’s 1/2000s limit but suffers due to slower autofocus. Neither has high burst rates or reliable tracking.
Low light above ISO 800 becomes noisy on both, with Canon faring slightly better.
Winner: Canon D20, barely
Street Photography
Here size, discreteness, and quick operation matter.
Samsung’s smaller size, touchscreen, and sleek build make it less conspicuous - good for candid shots.
Canon’s bulk and rugged looks can draw attention but offers more versatility.
Winner: Samsung TL220
Macro Photography
Canon D20 offers a minimum focusing distance of just 1 cm, fantastic for close-ups and macro shots, plus optical image stabilization supports steady focusing.
Samsung’s 5 cm minimum focusing distance limits close-up detail capability.
Winner: Canon D20
Night/Astro Photography
Low light capability depends heavily on sensor performance.
Canon’s CMOS sensor delivers cleaner high ISO images out to ISO 3200 with less noise.
Samsung’s CCD sensor noises up much earlier, limiting astro usability.
Neither has bulb mode, but Canon’s longer minimum shutter speed of 15s allows some night exposures.
Winner: Canon D20
Video Capabilities
Canon D20 shoots Full HD 1080p at 24fps with H.264 compression, far superior to Samsung’s max 720p at 30fps with motion JPEG format.
Neither has microphone or headphone ports, and stabilization is optical on both.
Canon’s video is overall more usable for casual filmmakers.
Winner: Canon D20
Travel Photography
Samsung’s smaller size and weight is a definite advantage for travel light packing. The touchscreen interface can speed dial menus.
However, Canon’s ruggedness protects against elements encountered on trips.
Battery life on both is modest, but Samsung’s MicroSD slot offers more flexible storage over Canon’s SD variants.
Winner: Depends on destination; rugged trips favor Canon; urban travel favors Samsung
Professional Work
Neither is professional-grade, but Canon’s better RAW support (none on either camera) or tethering is lacking here.
Canon’s GPS is a unique perk for geotagging professional shoots in remote locations.
Winner: Canon D20 marginally
Build Quality, Weatherproofing, and Durability
The Canon PowerShot D20 is clearly built like a tank with environmental sealing rated for:
- Waterproof to 10m
- Freezeproof to -10°C
- Shockproof to 2m drops
- Dustproof
This makes it a great companion for adventure photographers who want peace of mind handling rugged conditions without special housings.
The Samsung TL220 lacks all weatherproofing and shock resistance - an elegant compact that requires delicate handling.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity
The Canon D20 uses dedicated NB-6L batteries, which are readily available but somewhat limited in capacity. Samsung’s TL220 uses the SLB-07A battery, which is similar in size but suffers faster drain due to touchscreen usage.
Storage-wise, Canon supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with a full-size slot; Samsung uses MicroSD cards internally, which can be less convenient and slower.
On connectivity, Canon edges out with built-in GPS and Eye-Fi wireless support for WiFi transferring images (Eye-Fi being conditional on specific cards). Samsung TL220 has no wireless options.
HDMI output is present on the Canon but missing on Samsung.
Price and Value Analysis
At launch, the Canon D20 retailed near $300, reflecting its rugged construction and feature set. The Samsung TL220 came in around $90, making it a very budget-friendly compact.
Even today, used units command prices near those ranges due to their niche qualities. For those seeking ruggedness combined with performance, the D20 offers compelling value, while the TL220 remains a bargain for simple travel and daylight shooting.
Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses
| Canon PowerShot D20 | Samsung TL220 |
|---|---|
| Pros: Waterproof, freeze/shockproof, optical IS, longer zoom, Full HD video, GPS, better sensor/noise control | Smaller, lighter, touchscreen interface, cheaper, pocketable, stylish styling |
| Cons: Bulkier, no touchscreen, shorter battery life, no RAW support, outdated autofocus | No weather sealing, less reliable AF, noisier CCD sensor, limited zoom and aperture, poor video capabilities |
Sample Image Gallery: Real-World Shooting Results
In this comparative gallery, you can see the Canon D20’s sharper focus, richer contrast, and cleaner backgrounds versus the softer, sometimes noisier images from the Samsung TL220, especially in low light and macro close-ups.
Overall Performance Ratings
Taking sensor quality, autofocus, ergonomics, and video into account, here’s how I’d rate them overall from my testing database:
The D20 scores higher across most practical categories except for portability.
Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown
If you want a quick glance on which camera handles which photography style better:
As noted earlier, the Canon takes most categories except street photography, where Samsung TL220’s size and discrete design win.
Final Recommendations: Which Compact Camera Is Right for You?
If you’re a photography enthusiast or professional looking for a durable, versatile camera that can survive the elements and provide solid image quality and video, the Canon PowerShot D20 is the clear choice. Its better sensor technology, rugged design, GPS, and higher resolution video make it a dependable tool for outdoor portraits, landscapes, macro, and casual wildlife.
On the other hand, if you are primarily looking for a lightweight, stylish, affordable compact for casual street, travel, and everyday daylight shooting - and you don’t expect to shoot in bad weather or challenging light - the Samsung TL220 offers intuitive touchscreen control and decent image quality for a very modest price.
Budget-wise: Samsung TL220 is a budget cheapskate’s dream, but the Canon D20 remains affordable for its class and features.
For the serious hobbyist or adventurous professional: the Canon D20 is well worth the extra dough and bulk.
My Personal Bottom Line
After testing thousands of cameras over 15 years, I can state with confidence that sensor technology and environmental durability are the biggest differentiators here. The Canon PowerShot D20’s ruggedness alone lets you push creative boundaries and shooting locations many cheaper compacts would shy away from. Coupled with better optics and autofocus, it delivers stronger reliability and image quality.
Meanwhile, the Samsung TL220 is fine if size and simplicity override all else - but you trade versatility and performance.
So, if your photography journey involves unpredictable, wet, or rugged conditions, and you want a camera that won’t let you down, grab the Canon D20.
If you want a cute, cheap, easy-to-use daily shooter and don’t mind babysitting it, the Samsung TL220 might just delight you.
I hope this thorough comparison helps you make the call - after all, the best camera is the one you’ll consistently enjoy using. Whatever you choose, happy shooting!
Canon D20 vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot D20 | Samsung TL220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot D20 | Samsung TL220 |
| Other name | - | ST500 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-06-18 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.8 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 228 gr (0.50 pounds) | 169 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 71 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-6L | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10, Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $299 | $90 |