Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio TRYX
96 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio TRYX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Other Name is IXUS 145
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Revealed January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio TRYX Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Canon ELPH 135 and Casio TRYX, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Casio. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 135 (16MP) and TRYX (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ELPH 135 was manufactured 3 years after the TRYX which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the ELPH 135 grades versus the TRYX with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio TRYX Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 and Casio Exilim TRYX. The entire galleries are available at Canon ELPH 135 Gallery and Casio TRYX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 135 over the Casio TRYX
| ELPH 135 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | January 2011 | Newer by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Canon ELPH 135
| TRYX | ELPH 135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 135 and Casio TRYX
| ELPH 135 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio TRYX Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 135 has got outer measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Casio TRYX has specifications of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Canon ELPH 135 and Casio TRYX in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the ELPH 135 versus the TRYX.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 135 and TRYX is 96 and 99 respectively.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio TRYX Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking specs. The pic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 135 and TRYX.
All in all, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Canon ELPH 135 to resolve more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer ELPH 135 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio TRYX Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio TRYX Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Casio Exilim TRYX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Casio Exilim TRYX |
| Otherwise known as | IXUS 145 | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-12 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4+ | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 21mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 127g (0.28 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $119 | $689 |