Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR
96 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edeff/edeff7652823e1147a2ea54341e09df61849547c" alt="Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 front Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9d3c/a9d3cc5042100f00925cb4722dafdb90b1666e82" alt="FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Launched February 2014
- Also referred to as IXUS 145
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix Z808EXR
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Canon ELPH 135 versus FujiFilm Z800EXR, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the ELPH 135 (16MP) and Z800EXR (12MP) and the ELPH 135 (1/2.3") and Z800EXR (1/2") feature totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The ELPH 135 was unveiled 3 years later than the Z800EXR and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the ELPH 135 scores against the Z800EXR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 and FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR. The full galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 135 Gallery and FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 135 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
ELPH 135 | Z800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 44 months |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Canon ELPH 135
Z800EXR | ELPH 135 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 135 and FujiFilm Z800EXR
ELPH 135 | Z800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 135 comes with physical dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") having a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm Z800EXR has specifications of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Canon ELPH 135 versus FujiFilm Z800EXR in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the ELPH 135 against the Z800EXR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2351/b23516788343b1a605016409da516dd3a95da28e" alt="Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR size comparison Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 135 and Z800EXR is 96 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81b5/c81b52d275e72f9edcf800f3697b9796ef47b0cc" alt="Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR top view buttons comparison Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR top view buttons comparison"
Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The visual here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 135 and Z800EXR.
All in all, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The ELPH 135 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Canon ELPH 135 will produce extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The newer ELPH 135 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9794/f9794edb3285d5a9b26cfa49025bdb776a2fe5be" alt="Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR sensor size comparison Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR sensor size comparison"
Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11328/11328f7cc81324625ebb0e82dceff1b5c7bca9ed" alt="Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon ELPH 135 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR |
Also Known as | IXUS 145 | FinePix Z808EXR |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2014-02-12 | 2010-07-21 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 4+ | EXR |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | 1 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/3.9-4.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 9cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 127 gr (0.28 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-11L | NP-45A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $119 | $200 |