Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320
96 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Additionally referred to as IXUS 145
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Canon ELPH 135 and Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Kodak. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the ELPH 135 (16MP) and M320 (9MP) and the ELPH 135 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe ELPH 135 was released 5 years later than the M320 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the ELPH 135 scores vs the M320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 and Kodak EasyShare M320. The complete galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 135 Gallery and Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 135 over the Kodak M320
| ELPH 135 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 63 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon ELPH 135
| M320 | ELPH 135 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 135 and Kodak M320
| ELPH 135 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 135 enjoys exterior measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Kodak M320 has specifications of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Canon ELPH 135 and Kodak M320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the ELPH 135 and the M320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 135 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading through specs. The graphic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 135 and M320.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The ELPH 135 due to its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Canon ELPH 135 will give more detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more recent ELPH 135 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Also Known as | IXUS 145 | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-12 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 127 grams (0.28 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $119 | $39 |