Clicky

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320

Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
26
Overall
34
Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Canon ELPH 135
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
  • Revealed February 2014
  • Additionally referred to as IXUS 145
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Canon ELPH 135 and Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Kodak. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the ELPH 135 (16MP) and M320 (9MP) and the ELPH 135 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

The ELPH 135 was released 5 years later than the M320 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the ELPH 135 scores vs the M320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 135 over the Kodak M320

 ELPH 135 M320 
ReleasedFebruary 2014January 2009More recent by 63 months

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon ELPH 135

 M320 ELPH 135 

Common features in the Canon ELPH 135 and Kodak M320

 ELPH 135 M320 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal display measurement
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 135 enjoys exterior measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Kodak M320 has specifications of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

See the Canon ELPH 135 and Kodak M320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the ELPH 135 and the M320.

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 135 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading through specs. The graphic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 135 and M320.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The ELPH 135 due to its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Canon ELPH 135 will give more detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more recent ELPH 135 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Portrait photography camera
35
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
supports face detect focus
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
19
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW support
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon ELPH 135
Street photography with Kodak M320
58
built in image stabilization (Digital)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW support
more heavy than competition (155 grams)
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Sports Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Sports photography camera
41
built in image stabilization (Digital)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
supports tracking focus
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no phase detect AF
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Travel Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
66
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.2)
50
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (155 grams)
sensor resolution low (9MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 Landscape photography features
Kodak M320 Landscape photography features
39
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
22
no manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 as a Vlogging camera
Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
31
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
supports face detect focus
slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
more heavy than competition (155g)
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 135 and Kodak M320
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 135Kodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Brand Canon Kodak
Model Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 Kodak EasyShare M320
Also Known as IXUS 145 -
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2014-02-12 2009-01-08
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Digic 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 9 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3472 x 2604
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 9 25
Cross focus points 1 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-224mm (8.0x) 34-102mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-6.9 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focus range 1cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 6.3
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1400s
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, on, off, slow sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 127 grams (0.28 pounds) 155 grams (0.34 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 photographs -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-11L KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $119 $39