Clicky

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M340

Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
26
Overall
34
Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M340 Key Specs

Canon ELPH 135
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
  • Announced February 2014
  • Also referred to as IXUS 145
Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M340 Overview

The following is a in-depth assessment of the Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M340, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Canon and Kodak. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the ELPH 135 (16MP) and M340 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The ELPH 135 was introduced 5 years after the M340 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the ELPH 135 matches up versus the M340 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 135 over the Kodak M340

 ELPH 135 M340 
RevealedFebruary 2014January 2009Newer by 63 months

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Canon ELPH 135

 M340 ELPH 135 

Common features in the Canon ELPH 135 and Kodak M340

 ELPH 135 M340 
Focus manually No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display dimensions
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 135 has exterior measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") and a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Kodak M340 has measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).

Check the Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M340 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the ELPH 135 compared to the M340.

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M340 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 135 and M340 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M340 top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 135 and M340.

Clearly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Canon ELPH 135 to deliver extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent ELPH 135 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M340 sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon ELPH 135
Portrait photography with Kodak M340
35
resolution is good (16MP)
supports face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
19
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 Street photography features
Kodak M340 Street photography features
58
built in image stabilization (Digital)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon ELPH 135
Sports photography with Kodak M340
41
built in image stabilization (Digital)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
16
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon ELPH 135
Travel photography with Kodak M340
66
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
51
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 Landscape photography factors
Kodak M340 Landscape photography factors
39
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
resolution is good (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 Vlogging highlights
Kodak M340 Vlogging highlights
31
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
supports face detection focus
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic socket
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of mic jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 135 and Kodak M340
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 135Kodak EasyShare M340
General Information
Brand Canon Kodak
Model Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 Kodak EasyShare M340
Also called as IXUS 145 -
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2014-02-12 2009-01-05
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Digic 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3664 x 2748
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 9 5
Cross focus points 1 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-224mm (8.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-6.9 f/3.1-5.7
Macro focus range 1cm 7cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, on, off, slow sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 127 gr (0.28 lb) 115 gr (0.25 lb)
Physical dimensions 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-11L KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $119 $130