Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung ST93
96 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Announced February 2014
- Additionally Known as IXUS 145
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released April 2011
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Canon ELPH 135 versus Samsung ST93, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Canon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the ELPH 135 (16MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ELPH 135 was introduced 2 years later than the ST93 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the ELPH 135 grades versus the ST93 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 and Samsung ST93. The whole galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 135 Gallery and Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 135 over the Samsung ST93
| ELPH 135 | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | April 2011 | More recent by 35 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Canon ELPH 135
| ST93 | ELPH 135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 135 and Samsung ST93
| ELPH 135 | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 135 has external dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") and a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST93 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check out the Canon ELPH 135 versus Samsung ST93 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the ELPH 135 versus the ST93.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 135 and ST93 is 96 and 97 respectively.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 135 and ST93.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of pictures but you should really factor the release date of the products into consideration. The newer ELPH 135 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Samsung ST93 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Samsung ST93 |
| Also Known as | IXUS 145 | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-02-12 | 2011-04-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 127 gr (0.28 lbs) | 110 gr (0.24 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $119 | - |
