Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL240
Portability
96 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
96 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
Portability
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
Canon ELPH 135
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Released February 2014
- Additionally referred to as IXUS 145
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Canon ELPH 135 versus Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Canon and Samsung. The resolution of the ELPH 135 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ELPH 135 was unveiled 4 years later than the TL240 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the ELPH 135 matches up against the TL240 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 and Samsung TL240. The full galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 135 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 135 over the Samsung TL240
| ELPH 135 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 50 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Canon ELPH 135
| TL240 | ELPH 135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 135 and Samsung TL240
| ELPH 135 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 135 enjoys outer measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung TL240 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Canon ELPH 135 versus Samsung TL240 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the ELPH 135 against the TL240.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 135 and TL240 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing technical specs. The graphic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 135 and TL240.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Canon ELPH 135 to render greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more modern ELPH 135 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon ELPH 135 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung TL240 as a Portrait photography camera
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Canon ELPH 135 Street photography factors
Samsung TL240 Street photography factors
built in image stabilization (Digital)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
boasts focus by touch
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than competition in class (160g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Canon ELPH 135 Sports photography features
Samsung TL240 Sports photography features
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
slow fps (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Canon ELPH 135 Travel photography details
Samsung TL240 Travel photography details
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
boasts focus by touch
decent megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (160g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Canon ELPH 135 Landscape photography advice
Samsung TL240 Landscape photography advice
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
big screen (3.5 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 135 Vlogging advice
Samsung TL240 Vlogging advice
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detect focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone jack
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic support
heavier than competition in class (160g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also Known as | IXUS 145 | ST5000 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-02-12 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 127 gr (0.28 lb) | 160 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $119 | $171 |
