Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL320
96 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Announced February 2014
- Also referred to as IXUS 145
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also referred to as WB1000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Canon ELPH 135 and Samsung TL320, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Canon and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the ELPH 135 (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ELPH 135 was revealed 5 years after the TL320 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the ELPH 135 scores vs the TL320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 and Samsung TL320. The full galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 135 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 135 over the Samsung TL320
| ELPH 135 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 61 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Canon ELPH 135
| TL320 | ELPH 135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 135 and Samsung TL320
| ELPH 135 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 135 has outer dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") having a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Canon ELPH 135 and Samsung TL320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the ELPH 135 versus the TL320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 135 and TL320 is 96 and 98 respectively.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing specs. The image here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 135 and TL320.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Canon ELPH 135 to result in greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger ELPH 135 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon ELPH 135 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also called as | IXUS 145 | WB1000 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-02-12 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 127 grams (0.28 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $119 | $380 |