Clicky

Canon ELPH 135 vs Sony W320

Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
26
Overall
34
Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Canon ELPH 135 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Canon ELPH 135
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
  • Launched February 2014
  • Also referred to as IXUS 145
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon ELPH 135 vs Sony W320 Overview

Below is a detailed comparison of the Canon ELPH 135 versus Sony W320, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Canon and Sony. The image resolution of the ELPH 135 (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The ELPH 135 was launched 4 years later than the W320 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the ELPH 135 scores vs the W320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 135 over the Sony W320

 ELPH 135 W320 
IntroducedFebruary 2014January 2010More recent by 50 months

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Canon ELPH 135

 W320 ELPH 135 

Common features in the Canon ELPH 135 and Sony W320

 ELPH 135 W320 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal display size
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Canon ELPH 135 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 135 features physical measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony W320 has measurements of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check the Canon ELPH 135 versus Sony W320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the ELPH 135 against the W320.

Canon ELPH 135 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 135 and W320 is 96 and 97 respectively.

Canon ELPH 135 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 135 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 135 and W320.

As you can see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Canon ELPH 135 to result in more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more recent ELPH 135 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon ELPH 135 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 135 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 135 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W320 as a Portrait photography camera
35
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon ELPH 135
Street photography with Sony W320
58
has image stabilization (Digital)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W320 as a Sports photography camera
41
has image stabilization (Digital)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
26
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
max frames per second low (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon ELPH 135
Travel photography with Sony W320
66
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Timelapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
66
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.7)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 Landscape photography factors
Sony W320 Landscape photography factors
39
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse mode
33
really wide (26mm)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 135 Vlogging advice
Sony W320 Vlogging advice
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detect focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone socket
26
really wide (26mm)
slow max aperture (f2.7)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon ELPH 135 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 135 and Sony W320
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 135Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Sony
Model Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Also Known as IXUS 145 -
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2014-02-12 2010-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Digic 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 9
Cross focus points 1 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-224mm (8.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-6.9 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance 1cm 4cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 1 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.80 m
Flash options Auto, on, off, slow sync Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 127 gr (0.28 pounds) 117 gr (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-11L NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $119 $269