Clicky

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Kodak M320

Portability
95
Imaging
45
Features
21
Overall
35
Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Canon ELPH 150 IS
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 142g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
  • Announced February 2014
  • Also Known as IXUS 155
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Kodak M320 Overview

Let's look a bit more closely at the Canon ELPH 150 IS versus Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Canon and Kodak. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the ELPH 150 IS (20MP) and M320 (9MP) and the ELPH 150 IS (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The ELPH 150 IS was released 5 years after the M320 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the ELPH 150 IS matches up versus the M320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 150 IS over the Kodak M320

 ELPH 150 IS M320 
LaunchedFebruary 2014January 2009More modern by 63 months

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon ELPH 150 IS

 M320 ELPH 150 IS 

Common features in the Canon ELPH 150 IS and Kodak M320

 ELPH 150 IS M320 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.7"2.7"Same screen sizing
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 150 IS offers physical dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Kodak M320 has measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Analyze the Canon ELPH 150 IS versus Kodak M320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the ELPH 150 IS versus the M320.

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 150 IS and M320 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading technical specs. The picture underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 150 IS and M320.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The ELPH 150 IS featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Canon ELPH 150 IS will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher ELPH 150 IS is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon ELPH 150 IS Portrait photography factors
Kodak M320 Portrait photography factors
33
good megapixels (20MP)
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
19
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Canon ELPH 150 IS as a Street photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Street photography camera
59
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
47
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competitors (155g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon ELPH 150 IS
Sports photography with Kodak M320
39
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
max frames per second low (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
has no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon ELPH 150 IS
Travel photography with Kodak M320
67
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
50
built-in flash
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors (155g)
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 150 IS Landscape photography advice
Kodak M320 Landscape photography advice
41
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
22
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 150 IS Vlogging highlights
Kodak M320 Vlogging highlights
30
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic socket
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (155g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 150 IS and Kodak M320
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 ISKodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Brand Canon Kodak
Model type Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS Kodak EasyShare M320
Also called as IXUS 155 -
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2014-02-12 2009-01-08
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 9MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5152 x 3864 3472 x 2604
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 34-102mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-6.9 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focusing distance 1cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 6.3
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1400s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, on, off, slow sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 142 gr (0.31 pounds) 155 gr (0.34 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 230 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-11LH KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $149 $39