Clicky

Canon 160 vs Kodak M340

Portability
96
Imaging
45
Features
26
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24

Canon 160 vs Kodak M340 Key Specs

Canon 160
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2015
  • Alternative Name is IXUS 160
Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon 160 vs Kodak M340 Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Canon 160 vs Kodak M340, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the 160 (20MP) and M340 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The 160 was launched 6 years after the M340 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the 160 matches up vs the M340 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon 160 over the Kodak M340

 160 M340 
RevealedJanuary 2015January 2009Newer by 74 months

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Canon 160

 M340 160 

Common features in the Canon 160 and Kodak M340

 160 M340 
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent display size
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Canon 160 vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon 160 features physical dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Kodak M340 has proportions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).

Examine the Canon 160 vs Kodak M340 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the 160 and the M340.

Canon 160 vs Kodak M340 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 160 and M340 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Canon 160 vs Kodak M340 top view buttons comparison

Canon 160 vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The picture below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 160 and M340.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Canon 160 to give you more detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer 160 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Canon 160 vs Kodak M340 sensor size comparison

Canon 160 vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon 160 vs Kodak M340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon 160 as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak M340 as a Portrait photography camera
38
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
19
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon 160 as a Street photography camera
Kodak M340 as a Street photography camera
59
built in image stabilization (Digital)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Canon 160 Sports photography highlights
Kodak M340 Sports photography highlights
43
built in image stabilization (Digital)
MP count decent (20MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (0.8 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon 160 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak M340 as a Travel photography camera
67
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
51
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon 160
Landscape photography with Kodak M340
41
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
22
no manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Canon 160 Vlogging advice
Kodak M340 Vlogging advice
32
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detection focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic port
22
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon 160 vs Kodak M340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 160 and Kodak M340
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 160Kodak EasyShare M340
General Information
Brand Name Canon Kodak
Model type Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 Kodak EasyShare M340
Otherwise known as IXUS 160 -
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2015-01-06 2009-01-05
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 5152 x 3864 3664 x 2748
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 9 5
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-224mm (8.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-6.9 f/3.1-5.7
Macro focusing distance 1cm 7cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 2.7"
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 0.8 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 127g (0.28 lb) 115g (0.25 lb)
Dimensions 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 photographs -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-11L/LH KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $135 $130