Clicky

Canon 160 vs Kodak M575

Portability
96
Imaging
45
Features
26
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31

Canon 160 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs

Canon 160
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
  • Released January 2015
  • Also Known as IXUS 160
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon 160 vs Kodak M575 Overview

Below is a extended comparison of the Canon 160 and Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Kodak. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the 160 (20MP) and M575 (14MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The 160 was launched 5 years later than the M575 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the 160 scores vs the M575 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon 160 over the Kodak M575

 160 M575 
IntroducedJanuary 2015January 2010More recent by 61 months

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Canon 160

 M575 160 
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Canon 160 and Kodak M575

 160 M575 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Canon 160 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Canon 160 enjoys exterior dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Kodak M575 has specifications of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check the Canon 160 and Kodak M575 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the 160 against the M575.

Canon 160 vs Kodak M575 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 160 and M575 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Canon 160 vs Kodak M575 top view buttons comparison

Canon 160 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The photograph here may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 160 and M575.

As you have seen, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Canon 160 to give extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher 160 will have an edge in sensor tech.

Canon 160 vs Kodak M575 sensor size comparison

Canon 160 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon 160 vs Kodak M575 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon 160 Portrait photography factors
Kodak M575 Portrait photography factors
38
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
features face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
28
good resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Canon 160 Street photography information
Kodak M575 Street photography information
59
built in image stabilization (Digital)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
48
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than competition in class (152g)
low max ISO (1,000)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Canon 160 Sports photography features
Kodak M575 Sports photography features
43
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
features tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (0.8 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
26
good resolution (14 megapixels)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Canon 160 Travel photography features
Kodak M575 Travel photography features
67
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
68
good resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Canon 160 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak M575 as a Landscape photography camera
41
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
40
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
good resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,000)
no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Canon 160 as a Vlogging camera
Kodak M575 as a Vlogging camera
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
features face detect autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone port
28
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic port
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon 160 vs Kodak M575 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 160 and Kodak M575
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 160Kodak EasyShare M575
General Information
Brand Canon Kodak
Model type Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 Kodak EasyShare M575
Also referred to as IXUS 160 -
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2015-01-06 2010-01-05
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5152 x 3864 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1000
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-224mm (8.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-6.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1400s
Continuous shutter speed 0.8fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 127g (0.28 lb) 152g (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-11L/LH KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $135 $139