Canon 160 vs Nikon L31

On this page, we are reviewing the Canon 160 and Nikon L31, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Canon and Nikon. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the 160 (20MP) and L31 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The 160 was brought out about the same time to the L31 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief view of how the 160 matches up against the L31 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 & Nikon Coolpix L31. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon 160 Gallery & Nikon L31 Gallery.

For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon 160 features exterior dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") having a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Nikon L31 has proportions of 96mm x 59mm x 29mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Canon 160 and Nikon L31 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the 160 versus the L31.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 160 and L31 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The picture below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the 160 and L31.

As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Canon 160 to provide extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively.