Canon 160 vs Nikon S2900

Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Canon 160 and Nikon S2900, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Canon and Nikon. The resolution of the 160 (20MP) and the S2900 (20MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The 160 was introduced within a month of the S2900 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the 160 grades versus the S2900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 & Nikon Coolpix S2900. The whole galleries are available at Canon 160 Gallery & Nikon S2900 Gallery.

When you are looking to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Canon 160 features exterior measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Nikon S2900 has sizing of 95mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 119 grams (0.26 lbs).

Examine the Canon 160 and Nikon S2900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the 160 against the S2900.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 160 and S2900 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Sometimes, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing specs. The visual here should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the 160 and S2900.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you should factor the age of the cameras into account.