Canon 160 vs Nikon S6900

Here, we are reviewing the Canon 160 vs Nikon S6900, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Canon and Nikon. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the 160 (20MP) and S6900 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The 160 was introduced very close to the S6900 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the 160 scores against the S6900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 and Nikon Coolpix S6900. The whole galleries are provided at Canon 160 Gallery and Nikon S6900 Gallery.

For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon 160 enjoys physical dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Nikon S6900 has dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs).

Check the Canon 160 vs Nikon S6900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the 160 compared to the S6900.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the 160 and S6900 is 96 and 93 respectively.

Often, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through technical specs. The graphic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 160 and S6900.

As you have seen, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Canon 160 to produce extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively.