Canon 160 vs Nikon S7000

Here is a in-depth assessment of the Canon 160 versus Nikon S7000, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Canon and Nikon. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the 160 (20MP) and S7000 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The 160 was announced at a similar time to the S7000 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the 160 matches up versus the S7000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 & Nikon Coolpix S7000. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon 160 Gallery & Nikon S7000 Gallery.

If you're intending to carry your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon 160 features physical measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") and a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Nikon S7000 has specifications of 99mm x 60mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).

Analyze the Canon 160 versus Nikon S7000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the 160 compared to the S7000.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the 160 and S7000 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Usually, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 160 and S7000.

As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Canon 160 to offer more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively.