Clicky

Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320

Portability
95
Imaging
46
Features
29
Overall
39
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Canon 170 IS
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
  • 141g - 100 x 58 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2015
  • Other Name is IXUS 170
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Kodak. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the 170 IS (20MP) and M320 (9MP) and the 170 IS (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") have different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The 170 IS was manufactured 6 years after the M320 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the 170 IS scores against the M320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon 170 IS over the Kodak M320

 170 IS M320 
IntroducedJanuary 2015January 2009Newer by 73 months

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon 170 IS

 M320 170 IS 

Common features in the Canon 170 IS and Kodak M320

 170 IS M320 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.7"2.7"Same screen size
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon 170 IS provides physical dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check out the Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the 170 IS against the M320.

Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 170 IS and M320 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 170 IS and M320.

Clearly, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 170 IS due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Canon 170 IS will give you greater detail due to its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent 170 IS should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon 170 IS Portrait photography features
Kodak M320 Portrait photography features
39
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
19
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
low MP (9MP)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Canon 170 IS Street photography features
Kodak M320 Street photography features
59
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than competitors in class (155g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Canon 170 IS Sports photography factors
Kodak M320 Sports photography factors
44
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
low fps (0.8 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (9MP)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Canon 170 IS Travel photography info
Kodak M320 Travel photography info
70
megapixel count decent (20MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.6)
50
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (155 grams)
low MP (9 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Canon 170 IS Landscape photography advice
Kodak M320 Landscape photography advice
41
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
22
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW format
no Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Canon 170 IS Vlogging info
Kodak M320 Vlogging info
32
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.6)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic support
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone socket
more heavy than competitors in class (155g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 170 IS and Kodak M320
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 ISKodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Brand Name Canon Kodak
Model Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS Kodak EasyShare M320
Other name IXUS 170 -
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2015-01-06 2009-01-08
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5152 x 3864 3472 x 2604
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-300mm (12.0x) 34-102mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.6-7.0 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focus distance 1cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 6.3
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 0.8 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.00 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 141g (0.31 lb) 155g (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 100 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 200 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-11L/LH KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $149 $39