Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320
95 Imaging
45 Features
29 Overall
38
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
- 141g - 100 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Other Name is IXUS 170
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Kodak. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the 170 IS (20MP) and M320 (9MP) and the 170 IS (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") have different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 170 IS was manufactured 6 years after the M320 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the 170 IS scores against the M320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS and Kodak EasyShare M320. The entire galleries are available at Canon 170 IS Gallery and Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon 170 IS over the Kodak M320
170 IS | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2015 | January 2009 | Newer by 73 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon 170 IS
M320 | 170 IS |
---|
Common features in the Canon 170 IS and Kodak M320
170 IS | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same screen size | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon 170 IS provides physical dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the 170 IS against the M320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 170 IS and M320 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 170 IS and M320.
Clearly, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 170 IS due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Canon 170 IS will give you greater detail due to its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent 170 IS should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon 170 IS vs Kodak M320 Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Kodak |
Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
Other name | IXUS 170 | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2015-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 3472 x 2604 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.6-7.0 | f/2.8-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 0.8 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 141g (0.31 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-11L/LH | KLIC-7001 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $149 | $39 |