Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR
96 Imaging
46 Features
24 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da23e/da23eb0b578e06b14a1dfc27b3d6f08b65289fa4" alt="Canon PowerShot ELPH 180 front Canon PowerShot ELPH 180 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2c0/da2c07f0dfe5c264fe8f9886b1e21b4e9c9834b5" alt="Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 126g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Launched January 2016
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Released April 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Canon ELPH 180 and Fujifilm Z900EXR, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Canon and FujiFilm. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 180 (20MP) and Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and the ELPH 180 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") come with different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The ELPH 180 was introduced 4 years later than the Fujifilm Z900EXR and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the ELPH 180 scores vs the Fujifilm Z900EXR with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot ELPH 180 and Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR. The whole galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 180 Gallery and Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 180 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
ELPH 180 | Fujifilm Z900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | ![]() | April 2011 | More recent by 58 months |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Canon ELPH 180
Fujifilm Z900EXR | ELPH 180 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 180 and Fujifilm Z900EXR
ELPH 180 | Fujifilm Z900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 180 enjoys outside dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Fujifilm Z900EXR has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Canon ELPH 180 and Fujifilm Z900EXR in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the ELPH 180 compared to the Fujifilm Z900EXR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/517cc/517cc73a3a329babb331945b153dc3a7852b8237" alt="Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR size comparison Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 180 and Fujifilm Z900EXR is 96 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/009e3/009e31b3dcdb8867e0f78c01ffecbc82e9b99221" alt="Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR top view buttons comparison Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR top view buttons comparison"
Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 180 and Fujifilm Z900EXR.
As you have seen, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The ELPH 180 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Canon ELPH 180 will provide extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher ELPH 180 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5805f/5805fa296673745b9ccb57c834c09eb11ae57ac1" alt="Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR sensor size comparison Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR sensor size comparison"
Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e33a6/e33a6a6c95ed0eaf3a0d976ca662664463773e42" alt="Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon ELPH 180 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 180 | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 180 | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2016-01-05 | 2011-04-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 4+ | EXR |
Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/3.9-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 0.8 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 126 gr (0.28 lb) | 151 gr (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 220 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-11LH | NP-45A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $119 | $380 |