Canon ELPH 180 vs Kodak M320
96 Imaging
46 Features
24 Overall
37
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Canon ELPH 180 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 126g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2016
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 180 vs Kodak M320 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Canon ELPH 180 versus Kodak M320, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the ELPH 180 (20MP) and M320 (9MP) and the ELPH 180 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") provide different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ELPH 180 was unveiled 7 years after the M320 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the ELPH 180 scores vs the M320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon ELPH 180 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot ELPH 180 & Kodak EasyShare M320. The full galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 180 Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 180 over the Kodak M320
| ELPH 180 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2016 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 86 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon ELPH 180
| M320 | ELPH 180 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 180 and Kodak M320
| ELPH 180 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display size |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Canon ELPH 180 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 180 has physical dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Canon ELPH 180 versus Kodak M320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the ELPH 180 compared to the M320.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 180 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 180 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing specs. The pic here should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 180 and M320.
All in all, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The ELPH 180 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Canon ELPH 180 will provide more detail having an extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The younger ELPH 180 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 180 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon ELPH 180 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 180 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 180 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2016-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 0.8fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 126g (0.28 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-11LH | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $119 | $39 |
