Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1
95 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93bbc/93bbc90e8c9027454859aca5721bac27dbdd8006" alt="Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS front Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 144g - 97 x 56 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Additionally Known as IXUS 255 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Canon ELPH 330 HS and Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the ELPH 330 HS (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is very comparable but the ELPH 330 HS (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The ELPH 330 HS was manufactured 2 years after the XZ-1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the ELPH 330 HS grades vs the XZ-1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS & Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 330 HS Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 330 HS over the Olympus XZ-1
ELPH 330 HS | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Canon ELPH 330 HS
XZ-1 | ELPH 330 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper display (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 330 HS and Olympus XZ-1
ELPH 330 HS | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 330 HS offers physical dimensions of 97mm x 56mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon ELPH 330 HS and Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the ELPH 330 HS versus the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b9cc/5b9cc804934703141ec93f0baf176549b05b1369" alt="Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 330 HS and XZ-1 is 95 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70401/704010b530f20e40607b34211a08111cee18620f" alt="Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 330 HS and XZ-1.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The ELPH 330 HS featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Canon ELPH 330 HS will provide extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The newer ELPH 330 HS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec33c/ec33c99452cf6dde007d2ca3cf422f65d7b3fb53" alt="Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf83a/cf83a3b80c9c34d5d75600048e1ff1d9efca21b9" alt="Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS | Olympus XZ-1 |
Also referred to as | IXUS 255 HS | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 5 | TruePic V |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3664 x 2752 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | PureColor II G | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow sync, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 144 grams (0.32 lbs) | 275 grams (0.61 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 56 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 320 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-4L | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $179 | $567 |