Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Ricoh WG-30W
95 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 144g - 97 x 56 x 23mm
- Launched January 2013
- Also Known as IXUS 255 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
Photography Glossary Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Canon ELPH 330 HS versus Ricoh WG-30W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the ELPH 330 HS (12MP) and WG-30W (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ELPH 330 HS was announced 20 months before the WG-30W making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the ELPH 330 HS matches up against the WG-30W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS & Ricoh WG-30W. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 330 HS Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 330 HS over the Ricoh WG-30W
| ELPH 330 HS | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Canon ELPH 330 HS
| WG-30W | ELPH 330 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2014 | January 2013 | More recent by 20 months |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 330 HS and Ricoh WG-30W
| ELPH 330 HS | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 330 HS has physical dimensions of 97mm x 56mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30W has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Canon ELPH 330 HS versus Ricoh WG-30W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the ELPH 330 HS versus the WG-30W.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 330 HS and WG-30W is 95 and 91 respectively.
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements merely by looking at technical specs. The graphic here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 330 HS and WG-30W.
As you can tell, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-30W to give you extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older ELPH 330 HS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon ELPH 330 HS vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 330 HS | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Otherwise known as | IXUS 255 HS | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II G | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow sync, off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 144 grams (0.32 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 56 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | 300 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-4L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $179 | $280 |