Clicky

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Samsung ST65

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
39
Overall
39
Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
36
Features
19
Overall
29

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Canon ELPH 340 HS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1280 video
  • 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
  • 147g - 100 x 58 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2014
  • Other Name is IXUS 265 HS
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Samsung ST65 Overview

The following is a in-depth overview of the Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Canon and Samsung. The resolution of the ELPH 340 HS (16MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The ELPH 340 HS was revealed 3 years after the ST65 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the ELPH 340 HS matches up versus the ST65 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 340 HS over the Samsung ST65

 ELPH 340 HS ST65 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014January 2011Newer by 37 months
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display resolution461k460kSharper display (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Canon ELPH 340 HS

 ST65 ELPH 340 HS 

Common features in the Canon ELPH 340 HS and Samsung ST65

 ELPH 340 HS ST65 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 340 HS has got exterior measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Samsung ST65 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the ELPH 340 HS vs the ST65.

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 340 HS and ST65 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 340 HS and ST65.

As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Canon ELPH 340 HS to give more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher ELPH 340 HS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS Portrait photography highlights
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography highlights
40
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
28
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS Street photography info
Samsung ST65 Street photography info
56
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than others (147g)
49
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
max ISO too low (0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS Sports photography factors
Samsung ST65 Sports photography factors
33
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
max fps very slow (4.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (190 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
26
megapixel count decent (14MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon ELPH 340 HS
Travel photography with Samsung ST65
63
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long reach (300mm)
no Time Lapse mode
bad battery pack (190 CIPA)
heavier than others (147g)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
70
megapixel count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS Landscape photography details
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography details
45
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
bad battery pack (190 shots)
no Time Lapse mode
36
good maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 340 HS Vlogging advice
Samsung ST65 Vlogging advice
32
reasonably wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1280 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
no mic port
heavier than others (147g)
27
good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 340 HS and Samsung ST65
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HSSamsung ST65
General Information
Brand Name Canon Samsung
Model Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS Samsung ST65
Otherwise known as IXUS 265 HS -
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2014-01-06 2011-01-19
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 4+ -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 -
Min native ISO 100 -
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-300mm (12.0x) ()
Maximum aperture f/3.6-7.0 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 461 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1280 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1280 1280x720
Video data format H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 147 grams (0.32 lb) -
Dimensions 100 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 190 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-11LH -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $199 $130