Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1
95 Imaging
46 Features
39 Overall
43
![Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS front Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-350-HS/Canon-ELPH-350-HS-front.jpg)
![Fujifilm XQ1 front Fujifilm XQ1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-XQ1/Fujifilm-XQ1-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
- 147g - 100 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Additionally Known as IXUS 275 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced November 2013
- Renewed by Fujifilm XQ2
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the ELPH 350 HS (20MP) and Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) and the ELPH 350 HS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") posses totally different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The ELPH 350 HS was revealed 15 months later than the Fujifilm XQ1 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the ELPH 350 HS grades vs the Fujifilm XQ1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ1. The full galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 350 HS Gallery and Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 350 HS over the Fujifilm XQ1
ELPH 350 HS | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | November 2013 | Fresher by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Canon ELPH 350 HS
Fujifilm XQ1 | ELPH 350 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ1
ELPH 350 HS | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 350 HS features outside measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Fujifilm XQ1 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the ELPH 350 HS vs the Fujifilm XQ1.
![Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 size comparison Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-350-HS-vs-Fujifilm-XQ1-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ1 is 95 and 92 respectively.
![Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 top view buttons comparison Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-350-HS-vs-Fujifilm-XQ1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by going through technical specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm XQ1.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The ELPH 350 HS having a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Canon ELPH 350 HS will provide more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer ELPH 350 HS is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
![Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 sensor size comparison Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-350-HS-vs-Fujifilm-XQ1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-350-HS-vs-Fujifilm-XQ1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Fujifilm XQ1 Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS | Fujifilm XQ1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS | Fujifilm XQ1 |
Also Known as | IXUS 275 HS | - |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2013-11-26 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS X-TRANS II |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 2/3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 58.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.6-7.0 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.5 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, flash on, slow synchro, flash off | Auto, on, off, slow syncho |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 147 gr (0.32 lb) | 206 gr (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 pictures | 240 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-11LH | NP-48 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $219 | $500 |