Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Kodak M320
95 Imaging
45 Features
39 Overall
42
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
- 147g - 100 x 58 x 23mm
- Released February 2015
- Also referred to as IXUS 275 HS
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Kodak M320 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Canon and Kodak. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 350 HS (20MP) and M320 (9MP) and the ELPH 350 HS (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") come with totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe ELPH 350 HS was released 6 years later than the M320 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the ELPH 350 HS grades versus the M320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Kodak M320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS & Kodak EasyShare M320. The complete galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 350 HS Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 350 HS over the Kodak M320
| ELPH 350 HS | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 74 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon ELPH 350 HS
| M320 | ELPH 350 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Kodak M320
| ELPH 350 HS | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon ELPH 350 HS enjoys outside dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Kodak M320 has proportions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Kodak M320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the ELPH 350 HS against the M320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 350 HS and M320 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through specifications. The photograph below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 350 HS and M320.
Plainly, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The ELPH 350 HS because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Canon ELPH 350 HS will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer ELPH 350 HS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Also called as | IXUS 275 HS | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2015-02-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.6-7.0 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.5 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, slow synchro, flash off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 147 gr (0.32 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11LH | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $219 | $39 |