Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M320
95 Imaging
46 Features
39 Overall
43
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
- 147g - 100 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2016
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M320 Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Canon and Kodak. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the ELPH 360 HS (20MP) and M320 (9MP) and the ELPH 360 HS (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ELPH 360 HS was announced 7 years after the M320 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the ELPH 360 HS matches up vs the M320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS & Kodak EasyShare M320. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 360 HS Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 360 HS over the Kodak M320
| ELPH 360 HS | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2016 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 86 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon ELPH 360 HS
| M320 | ELPH 360 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 360 HS and Kodak M320
| ELPH 360 HS | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 360 HS comes with outer dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the ELPH 360 HS versus the M320.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 360 HS and M320 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The image below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 360 HS and M320.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The ELPH 360 HS having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Canon ELPH 360 HS will provide you with more detail with its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent ELPH 360 HS will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2016-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.6-7.0 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.5 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 147 grams (0.32 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11LH | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $209 | $39 |