Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M340
95 Imaging
46 Features
39 Overall
43
96 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
- 147g - 100 x 58 x 23mm
- Launched January 2016
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Announced January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M340 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M340, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Canon and Kodak. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the ELPH 360 HS (20MP) and M340 (10MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe ELPH 360 HS was launched 7 years later than the M340 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the ELPH 360 HS grades versus the M340 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M340 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS and Kodak EasyShare M340. The complete galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 360 HS Gallery and Kodak M340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 360 HS over the Kodak M340
| ELPH 360 HS | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2016 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 86 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Canon ELPH 360 HS
| M340 | ELPH 360 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 360 HS and Kodak M340
| ELPH 360 HS | M340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 360 HS has got physical dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Kodak M340 has dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).
Look at the Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M340 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the ELPH 360 HS vs the M340.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 360 HS and M340 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing specs. The visual below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 360 HS and M340.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Canon ELPH 360 HS to produce extra detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher ELPH 360 HS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Kodak M340 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS | Kodak EasyShare M340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS | Kodak EasyShare M340 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2016-01-05 | 2009-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3664 x 2748 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-7.0 | f/3.1-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.5 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 147 gr (0.32 lbs) | 115 gr (0.25 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11LH | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $209 | $130 |