Clicky

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
95
Imaging
46
Features
39
Overall
43
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Canon ELPH 360 HS
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
  • 147g - 100 x 58 x 23mm
  • Released January 2016
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Following is a thorough overview of the Canon ELPH 360 HS and Olympus VR-320, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 360 HS (20MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The ELPH 360 HS was released 4 years after the VR-320 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Canon ELPH 360 HS being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the ELPH 360 HS grades vs the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 360 HS over the Olympus VR-320

 ELPH 360 HS VR-320 
IntroducedJanuary 2016July 2011More modern by 55 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon ELPH 360 HS

 VR-320 ELPH 360 HS 

Common features in the Canon ELPH 360 HS and Olympus VR-320

 ELPH 360 HS VR-320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 360 HS enjoys outside measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Canon ELPH 360 HS and Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the ELPH 360 HS and the VR-320.

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 360 HS and VR-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The picture here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 360 HS and VR-320.

As you have seen, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Canon ELPH 360 HS to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher ELPH 360 HS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Portrait photography details
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography details
44
manual focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
offers face detect focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
33
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
provides face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Street photography features
Olympus VR-320 Street photography features
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than others (147 grams)
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Sports photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography advice
37
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
max frames per second very slow (2.5 frames/s)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (180 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Travel photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography highlights
64
MP count decent (20MP)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
bad battery pack (180 CIPA)
heavier than others (147g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
70
lighter than others (158 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Landscape photography features
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography features
48
manual focus
really wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
bad battery pack (180 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse function
42
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 360 HS Vlogging factors
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging factors
33
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.6)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic jack
heavier than others (147 grams)
32
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
lighter than others (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon ELPH 360 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 360 HS and Olympus VR-320
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HSOlympus VR-320
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS Olympus VR-320
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2016-01-05 2011-07-19
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 4+ TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-300mm (12.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture f/3.6-7.0 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 461k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 2.5 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.00 m (at Auto ISO) 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, on, slow synchro, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 147 gr (0.32 pounds) 158 gr (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-11LH LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $209 $179