Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400
Portability
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Key Specs
Canon ELPH 530 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Additionally Known as IXUS 510 HS
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Canon ELPH 530 HS versus Casio EX-ZR400, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Canon and Casio. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 530 HS (10MP) and EX-ZR400 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe ELPH 530 HS was announced 11 months earlier than the EX-ZR400 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the ELPH 530 HS scores versus the EX-ZR400 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS and Casio Exilim EX-ZR400. The whole galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery and Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Casio EX-ZR400
| ELPH 530 HS | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.2" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Canon ELPH 530 HS
| EX-ZR400 | ELPH 530 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | February 2012 | Fresher by 11 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Casio EX-ZR400
| ELPH 530 HS | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 461k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 530 HS comes with outside dimensions of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZR400 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Canon ELPH 530 HS versus Casio EX-ZR400 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the ELPH 530 HS compared to the EX-ZR400.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 530 HS and EX-ZR400 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 530 HS and EX-ZR400.
Clearly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR400 to show extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older ELPH 530 HS will be behind in sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Portrait photography camera
offers face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon ELPH 530 HS
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR400
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has focus via touch
lighter than competition in class (163 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Sports photography advice
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography advice
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (190 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
high fps (30.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
better than average battery pack (500 shots)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS as a Travel photography camera
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition in class (163 grams)
has focus via touch
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
very long reach (336mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
terrible battery pack (190 per charge)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
better than average battery pack (500 CIPA)
lighter than competition (205g)
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
no Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Landscape photography info
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography info
pretty wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3.2 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
terrible battery pack (190 shots)
lack of Time Lapse recording
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
better than average battery pack (500 shots)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Vlogging factors
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging factors
pretty wide (28mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (163g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic support
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 |
| Also Known as | IXUS 510 HS | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2013-01-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 5 | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 30.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 163 grams (0.36 lbs) | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photos | 500 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-9L | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $250 | $0 |