Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36


93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2012
- Additionally Known as IXUS 510 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed April 2009

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Fujifilm F200EXR, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the ELPH 530 HS (10MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is relatively similar but the ELPH 530 HS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") have different sensor measurements.

The ELPH 530 HS was brought out 2 years after the Fujifilm F200EXR which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the ELPH 530 HS scores vs the Fujifilm F200EXR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The entire galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Fujifilm F200EXR
ELPH 530 HS | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | ![]() | April 2009 | More modern by 34 months |
Screen size | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Canon ELPH 530 HS
Fujifilm F200EXR | ELPH 530 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Fujifilm F200EXR
ELPH 530 HS | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon ELPH 530 HS offers outer measurements of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F200EXR has proportions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Fujifilm F200EXR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the ELPH 530 HS compared to the Fujifilm F200EXR.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 530 HS and Fujifilm F200EXR is 95 and 93 respectively.

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 530 HS and Fujifilm F200EXR.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The ELPH 530 HS due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Fujifilm F200EXR will offer greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer ELPH 530 HS should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
Also Known as | IXUS 510 HS | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2009-04-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.3-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.50 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 163g (0.36 lb) | 205g (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-9L | NP-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $250 | $350 |