Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2012
- Also Known as IXUS 510 HS
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Launched January 2014
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Canon and Kodak. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the ELPH 530 HS (10MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ELPH 530 HS was released 23 months prior to the Astro Zoom AZ651 making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Canon ELPH 530 HS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the ELPH 530 HS scores against the Astro Zoom AZ651 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS & Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651. The complete galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery & Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
ELPH 530 HS | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Canon ELPH 530 HS
Astro Zoom AZ651 | ELPH 530 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | February 2012 | Newer by 23 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper display (+459k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
ELPH 530 HS | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 530 HS offers physical measurements of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the ELPH 530 HS vs the Astro Zoom AZ651.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 530 HS and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 95 and 65 respectively.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the ELPH 530 HS and Astro Zoom AZ651.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged ELPH 530 HS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Kodak |
Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 |
Alternative name | IXUS 510 HS | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-02-07 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 21 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-1560mm (65.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.50 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 163 grams (0.36 lbs) | 567 grams (1.25 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-9L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $250 | $419 |