Clicky

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus 9000

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
40
Overall
36
Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Canon ELPH 530 HS
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.2" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
  • 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
  • Released February 2012
  • Additionally referred to as IXUS 510 HS
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju 9000
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus 9000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the ELPH 530 HS (10MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

The ELPH 530 HS was introduced 2 years after the 9000 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the ELPH 530 HS matches up versus the 9000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Olympus 9000

 ELPH 530 HS 9000 
IntroducedFebruary 2012May 2009Newer by 34 months
Screen size3.2"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution461k230kSharper screen (+231k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Canon ELPH 530 HS

 9000 ELPH 530 HS 

Common features in the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Olympus 9000

 ELPH 530 HS 9000 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 530 HS provides physical dimensions of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

See the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus 9000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the ELPH 530 HS vs the 9000.

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 530 HS and 9000 is 95 and 92 respectively.

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 530 HS and 9000.

As you can see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus 9000 to deliver more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer ELPH 530 HS provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon ELPH 530 HS Portrait photography factors
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography factors
26
offers face detection focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
21
no manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Street Comparison

Canon ELPH 530 HS Street photography highlights
Olympus 9000 Street photography highlights
66
image stabilization (Optical)
supports focus by touch
lighter than competition in class (163 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
more heavy than competitors in class (225g)
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Sports Comparison

Canon ELPH 530 HS Sports photography details
Olympus 9000 Sports photography details
29
image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery (190 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Travel Comparison

Canon ELPH 530 HS Travel photography highlights
Olympus 9000 Travel photography highlights
64
lighter than competition in class (163 grams)
supports focus by touch
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
great zoom (336mm)
no Time Lapse mode
bad battery (190 CIPA)
low MP (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.4)
58
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
long zoom (280mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (225 grams)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Landscape Comparison

Canon ELPH 530 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Landscape photography camera
35
decently wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3.2 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
lack of manual mode
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
bad battery (190 shots)
no Time Lapse mode
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Vlogging Comparison

Canon ELPH 530 HS Vlogging details
Olympus 9000 Vlogging details
35
decently wide (28mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (163g)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
no external mic port
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone support
more heavy than competitors in class (225g)
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon ELPH 530 HS and Olympus 9000
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HSOlympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS Olympus Stylus 9000
Also called as IXUS 510 HS mju 9000
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Released 2012-02-07 2009-05-14
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 5 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 50
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-336mm (12.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.4-5.6 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3.2" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech PureColor II Touch TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 2.50 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 163 grams (0.36 lbs) 225 grams (0.50 lbs)
Physical dimensions 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 190 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-9L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $250 $300