Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-320
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Additionally referred to as IXUS 510 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the ELPH 530 HS (10MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ELPH 530 HS was manufactured about the same time to the TG-320 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the ELPH 530 HS matches up vs the TG-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS & Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Olympus TG-320
ELPH 530 HS | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.2" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Canon ELPH 530 HS
TG-320 | ELPH 530 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Olympus TG-320
ELPH 530 HS | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | January 2012 | Similar age | |
Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 530 HS has got outside measurements of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the ELPH 530 HS versus the TG-320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 530 HS and TG-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The picture below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 530 HS and TG-320.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-320 to offer extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Olympus TG-320 |
Also Known as | IXUS 510 HS | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 5 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.2" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.50 m | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 163g (0.36 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 images | 150 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-9L | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $250 | $0 |