Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Samsung WB800F
95 Imaging
33 Features
40 Overall
35
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Alternate Name is IXUS 510 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Canon and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the ELPH 530 HS (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe ELPH 530 HS was revealed 11 months earlier than the WB800F so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the ELPH 530 HS grades versus the WB800F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS & Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Samsung WB800F
| ELPH 530 HS | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Canon ELPH 530 HS
| WB800F | ELPH 530 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | February 2012 | More modern by 11 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Samsung WB800F
| ELPH 530 HS | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 530 HS has outside measurements of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the ELPH 530 HS compared to the WB800F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 530 HS and WB800F is 95 and 92 respectively.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 530 HS and WB800F.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to provide you with more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged ELPH 530 HS will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Samsung WB800F |
| Also called as | IXUS 510 HS | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 163 gr (0.36 pounds) | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-9L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $250 | $300 |