Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony HX400V
Portability
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
Canon ELPH 530 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2012
- Also referred to as IXUS 510 HS
Sony HX400V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Released February 2014
- Superseded the Sony HX300
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony HX400V Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony HX400V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Canon and Sony. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 530 HS (10MP) and HX400V (20MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ELPH 530 HS was released 24 months prior to the HX400V which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon ELPH 530 HS being a Compact camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the ELPH 530 HS matches up against the HX400V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony HX400V Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The complete galleries are available at Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery and Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Sony HX400V
| ELPH 530 HS | HX400V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.2" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Canon ELPH 530 HS
| HX400V | ELPH 530 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 24 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Sony HX400V
| ELPH 530 HS | HX400V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 530 HS provides physical dimensions of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Sony HX400V has dimensions of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") along with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Check the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony HX400V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the ELPH 530 HS compared to the HX400V.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 530 HS and HX400V is 95 and 62 respectively.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The graphic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 530 HS and HX400V.
All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Sony HX400V to produce greater detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older ELPH 530 HS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Portrait photography highlights
Sony HX400V Portrait photography highlights
provides face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
manual focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
features face detection autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Street photography factors
Sony HX400V Street photography factors
image stabilization (Optical)
offers touch focus
lighter than average in class (163 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (660 grams)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS as a Sports photography camera
Sony HX400V as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery power (190 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
features tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Travel photography highlights
Sony HX400V Travel photography highlights
lighter than average in class (163g)
offers touch focus
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
great reach (336mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
low battery power (190 shots)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.4)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (660 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon ELPH 530 HS
Landscape photography with Sony HX400V
fairly wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3.2")
image stabilization (Optical)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
manual exposure not possible
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
low battery power (190 per charge)
lack of Timelapse mode
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS as a Vlogging camera
Sony HX400V as a Vlogging camera
fairly wide (28mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (163g)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone socket
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with external microphone port
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
more heavy than competition in class (660 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony HX400V Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
| Also Known as | IXUS 510 HS | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2014-02-12 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 5 | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3.2" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.50 m | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 163g (0.36 lb) | 660g (1.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 shots | 300 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-9L | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $250 | $448 |
