Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony WX300
Portability
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Portability
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony WX300 Key Specs
Canon ELPH 530 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2012
- Also referred to as IXUS 510 HS
Sony WX300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
- Launched February 2013
- Refreshed by Sony WX350
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony WX300 Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony WX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the ELPH 530 HS (10MP) and WX300 (18MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ELPH 530 HS was unveiled 12 months earlier than the WX300 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the ELPH 530 HS grades versus the WX300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony WX300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300. The full galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery & Sony WX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Sony WX300
| ELPH 530 HS | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.2" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Canon ELPH 530 HS
| WX300 | ELPH 530 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2013 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 12 months |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Sony WX300
| ELPH 530 HS | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Canon ELPH 530 HS has physical dimensions of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Sony WX300 has specifications of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony WX300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the ELPH 530 HS compared to the WX300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 530 HS and WX300 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The image here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 530 HS and WX300.
Plainly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Sony WX300 to offer extra detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged ELPH 530 HS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon ELPH 530 HS
Portrait photography with Sony WX300
supports face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
MP count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
resolution is good (18MP)
has face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Street photography factors
Sony WX300 Street photography factors
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes focus by touch
lighter than competition in class (163g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (166g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon ELPH 530 HS
Sports photography with Sony WX300
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (190 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (18MP)
has tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS as a Travel photography camera
Sony WX300 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition in class (163g)
includes focus by touch
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
great zoom (336mm)
no Time Lapse mode
bad battery life (190 CIPA)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
lighter than others (166g)
resolution is good (18MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
great zoom (500mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Landscape photography info
Sony WX300 Landscape photography info
rather wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3.2 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
no manual control
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery life (190 CIPA)
no Time Lapse mode
relatively wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (18 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon ELPH 530 HS
Vlogging with Sony WX300
rather wide (28mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (163 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no mic support
relatively wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (166g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
does not have external microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Sony WX300 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 |
| Also called as | IXUS 510 HS | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2013-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.2" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.50 m | 4.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 163 gr (0.36 lbs) | 166 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-9L | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $250 | $330 |