Clicky

Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL30

Portability
92
Imaging
52
Features
66
Overall
57
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II front
 
Samsung SL30 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
14
Overall
24

Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs

Canon G9 X II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
  • 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
  • Released January 2017
  • Superseded the Canon G9 X
Samsung SL30
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
  • Introduced February 2009
  • Alternative Name is ES15
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL30: Compact Camera Showdown for Budget-Conscious Enthusiasts

When you think of buying a compact camera for casual or enthusiast photography, the choices can span decades and categories - from modest point-and-shoots to large-sensor advanced compacts. Today, I’m diving deep into a fascinating comparison: the Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II, released in 2017, versus the Samsung SL30, dating all the way back to 2009. At first glance, this feels like comparing apples to oranges given the eight-year gap and technology leaps. Still, I’ve personally tested both cameras over the years and want to give you a practical, no-nonsense look at how these two cameras perform in real-world shoots, across multiple photography styles and use cases, while keeping the cheapskate in us all in mind.

Let’s break down how these cameras stack up in build, sensor tech, imaging chops, autofocus, ergonomics, and more - rounding it all off with recommendations on who each camera might actually serve best.

Getting a Feel for Size and Ergonomics: Handling Matters

Before firing off any shots, how a camera feels in your hands can make or break your shooting experience. The Canon G9 X II is a modern compact featuring a sleek slab design, just 98x58x31 mm, weighing 206 grams. Samsung SL30, meanwhile, is smaller and lighter - 94x61x23 mm and 140 grams, full eight years earlier.

Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL30 size comparison

From first touch, the G9 X II feels more substantial and better balanced for still photography, especially for those with larger fingers or people who like their clubs for thumbs. Its grip is minimal but sufficient, while the Samsung SL30, though slim, feels a tight squeeze for sustained use without an optional add-on grip.

Beyond size, control layout is critical. The G9 X II sports a streamlined but intuitive top plate and back controls, including a responsive touchscreen. SL30 opts for a minimalist physical interface with small buttons and no touchscreen.

Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL30 top view buttons comparison

For photographers prioritizing quick handling, exposure adjustments, and menu navigation, Canon clearly leads here. The SL30 makes do but can leave you fiddling when you want simple aperture or shutter tweaks on the fly.

Ergonomics takeaway: Canon G9 X II offers a more versatile and comfortable handling experience suitable for longer shoots and quick parameter changes. Samsung’s SL30 targets snapshots - lightweight, pocketable, but less friendly for manual control enthusiasts.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

If you’re reading this comparison with any serious intent, sensor quality and resultant image output must dominate your decision. This is where the Canon G9 X II’s 1-inch BSI CMOS sensor (13.2x8.8 mm) and DIGIC 7 processor leaves the much older 1/2.3" CCD sensor (6.08x4.56 mm) in the Samsung SL30 in the dust.

Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL30 sensor size comparison

Let’s crunch some key technical data:

Feature Canon G9 X II Samsung SL30
Sensor size 1" (13.2 x 8.8 mm) 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm)
Resolution 20 MP (5472 x 3648 px) 10 MP (3648 x 2736 px)
Sensor type BSI CMOS CCD
Max native ISO 12,800 1,600
Image processor DIGIC 7 None specified
Dynamic range (DxOMark) 12.5 stops Not tested
Color depth (DxOMark) 21.9 bits Not tested
Low light ISO Score 522 Not tested

I rely on methodical lab tests combined with field tests for portrait and landscape shooting, and Canon’s sensor clearly offers superior dynamic range, color fidelity, and noise control - especially past ISO 800. The older Samsung sensor and CCD technology struggle to deal with shadows and highlights, resulting in lower detail retention and more noise at elevated ISO settings.

Both cameras feature a 3x optical zoom in roughly similar focal length ranges, though the Samsung’s 38–114 mm has a longer effective reach with a 5.9x crop factor versus the Canon’s 28–84 mm at 2.7x crop factor. But image quality falls markedly behind on Samsung’s side, especially at telephoto.

Real-world output samples:

Here you can see Canon’s crisper details, more natural skin tones, and richer color rendition, while Samsung’s shots show softness, lower resolution, and mild chromatic aberrations.

LCD and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shot

Neither camera sports a traditional or electronic viewfinder, so the rear LCDs become your composition and review portals.

Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The G9 X II’s 3-inch, 1040k dots touchscreen is brighter, more responsive, and offers touch-focus - useful for quick framing and AF point selection.

Contrast that with the SL30’s 2.5-inch, 230k dot fixed screen, no touchscreen. It’s adequate for sunny outdoor framing but lacks finesse for previewing exposure or fine detail.

For photographers who shoot in bright conditions or require precise AF control, the Canon’s screen is a clear win.

Autofocus and Focus Features: Critical for Action and Precision

Autofocus can be a deal breaker when shooting moving subjects or needing pinpoint focus. The Canon G9 X II uses contrast-detection AF only (no phase-detection pixels), yet implements face detection and offers multiple AF modes:

  • Single AF
  • Continuous AF
  • Touch AF
  • Face detection AF
  • Tracking AF

The Samsung SL30 relies on a much simpler contrast AF system with single-area focusing and face detect but no tracking or continuous AF.

Canon supports multiple focus areas and touch AF for precision. Samsung locks onto the center or faces but can hunt and be slow to lock in dim conditions.

In practical wildlife or street photography testing, Canon’s AF is noticeably faster and more reliable, allowing bursts at 8.2 fps with AF tracking, versus no continuous burst on Samsung.

Burst Shooting and Shutter Speeds: Catching the Moment

With sports or wildlife shooters in mind, continuous burst and shutter speed range contribute heavily to capturing peak action.

Camera Max Continuous Burst Shutter Speed Range
Canon G9 X II 8.2 fps 30s – 1/2000s (no electronic)
Samsung SL30 n/a 8s – 1/1500s

While the Samsung’s shutter caps at 1/1500s (slow for bright action shots), Canon extends up to 1/2000s (still modest but better). Burst mode on Canon is usable for casual sports shooters, whereas Samsung offers no burst mode.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ruggedness on the Road

Neither camera is weather sealed, dustproof, or shockproof. Canon’s G9 X II sports a metal chassis versus SL30’s plastic body.

For travel or rougher environments, G9 X II will resist wear better but both models require some care.

Lens & Zoom: Versatility or Limitations?

Both cameras feature fixed lenses with optical zoom but no interchangeable lens support (duh, compacts). Here’s the rundown:

Camera Optical Zoom Range Max Aperture Range Macro Focus Distance
Canon G9 X II 3x (28–84 mm equiv) f/2.0 – f/4.9 5 cm
Samsung SL30 3x (38–114 mm equiv) f/2.8 – f/5.7 5 cm

Canon has a wider-angle start, faster max aperture on the wide end, and overall more versatile lens for low-light and environmental portraits or landscapes. Samsung pushes longer telephoto focal length, which can be handy for casual zoom-in shots but at the cost of image quality and aperture speed.

Battery Life and Storage: How Long Will It Last?

Canon G9 X II claims a battery life rating of approximately 235 shots per charge, powered by a rechargeable battery pack. Samsung SL30 lacks official battery life specs (getting an old proprietary battery is a chore).

Storage-wise, both accept SD or SDHC cards (Samsung also supports MMC). Neither features dual slots or high-speed card options.

For day-long travel or event shoots, Canon's modest battery life means packing a spare or charging frequently. Samsung might fare similarly or worse given age and simpler power management.

Connectivity Features: Modern Convenience vs Vintage Minimalism

Big difference here. Canon G9 X II offers:

  • Built-in Wi-Fi
  • Bluetooth
  • NFC
  • HDMI output
  • USB 2.0

Samsung SL30 features only USB 2.0, no wireless connectivity or HDMI out.

If instant image transfer, remote control via smartphone, or easy social sharing matters, Canon’s the only contender.

Video Capabilities: Casual Clips or Serious Capture?

Canon’s G9 X II records Full HD 1080p video at 60fps using H.264 codec and offers very usable video stabilization (optical). No microphone or headphone jacks though.

Samsung hits a weak spot here - max video resolution is VGA (640x480) at 30fps, and only MJPEG format, which is heavy and low quality by today’s standards.

If video content is part of your toolkit, Canon leaps ahead.

Putting It All Together: Scorecards and Performance by Photography Genre

To help you see overall and genre-specific ranking, here’s a graphical summary of how these cameras scored in my real-world, controlled testing sessions across diverse photographic needs.

Interpretation highlights:

  • Portraits: Canon beats Samsung with superior color reproduction, skin tones, and bokeh thanks to sensor size and lens.
  • Landscape: Canon’s dynamic range and resolution win, plus sharper rendering.
  • Wildlife & Sports: Canon’s faster AF and burst rate deliver for casual action shoots; Samsung barely usable here.
  • Street & Travel: Samsung’s small size and weight make it discreet, but Canon’s better IQ and control win for serious street shooting.
  • Macro & Night: Canon’s stabilization and ISOs perform well, Samsung lacks precision and struggles in low light.
  • Video: Canon clearly head and shoulders above Samsung’s legacy VGA cruncher.

Who Should Buy the Canon G9 X Mark II?

If you’re a photography enthusiast or pro stepping down from heavy DSLRs for casual carry, or a dedicated compacts lover wanting excellent image quality in a pocketable package, Canon G9 X II is your camera. Its 1-inch sensor with 20MP resolution punches well beyond the compact class average. The DIGIC 7 processor, touchscreen, decent autofocus versatility, and modern connectivity make it a workhorse for portrait, landscape, travel, and social shooter needs.

Its limitations? Modest battery life and no viewfinder may disappoint pro users wanting all-in-one camera body versatility, and no 4K video may be a sticking point.

Pros:

  • Large 1" sensor with high image quality
  • Responsive touchscreen and intuitive controls
  • Built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC
  • Optical image stabilization
  • Usable Full HD 60p video
  • Good burst shooting for action

Cons:

  • No electronic viewfinder (EVF)
  • Modest battery endurance
  • Fixed lens limits creative flexibility
  • No 4K video or mic/headphone jacks

Who Could Consider the Samsung SL30?

Samsung SL30 is a true entry-level compact from a bygone era. At roughly one-fifth Canon’s price (cash-strapped hobbyists might smile), it offers ultra-basic shooting with simple auto modes and minimal features suitable for snapshots, travel as a slim backup, or point-and-shoot casual funers. It fits well in purses or pockets as an emergency or backup camera when quality isn’t paramount.

However, anyone serious about photography - including beginners wanting to learn manual controls and autofocus or shoot video - will find SL30 very limiting and dated.

Pros:

  • Very compact and lightweight
  • Simple operation for snapshot shooting
  • Low price point (under $100)
  • Decent zoom reach for casual use

Cons:

  • Poor low-light and image quality
  • No continuous autofocus or burst mode
  • Dated slow autofocus system
  • No modern connectivity or video features
  • Limited control and no touchscreen

Final Verdict: Which Compact Fits Your Needs and Wallet?

If you want a compact camera that delivers competent image quality, control flexibility, and modern features suitable for enthusiasts or professionals wanting pocketable convenience, the Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II is clearly the superior choice. It balances size, sensor capability, autofocus, and shooting modes to cover a wide photography discipline palette including portraits, landscapes, street, macro, and casual video.

The Samsung SL30 is more a relic for basic snapshots or collectors looking to experiment with older compacts at very low cost. Its image quality and features just can’t keep pace with current expectations or serious photo demands.

A Quick Summary Table for Your Decision-Making

Feature Canon G9 X II Samsung SL30
Sensor 1" BSI-CMOS, 20 MP 1/2.3" CCD, 10 MP
ISO Range 125–12,800 80–1,600
Lens 28-84mm equiv, f/2.0–4.9 38-114mm equiv, f/2.8–5.7
AF System Contrast detection, touch Contrast detection, no touch
Burst 8.2 fps No burst
Screen 3" touchscreen, 1040k dots 2.5" fixed, 230k dots
Video 1080p 60fps, H.264 640x480 VGA, MJPEG
Connectivity Wi-Fi, BT, NFC, HDMI None
Battery Life ~235 shots Unknown
Weight 206 g 140 g
Price (approximate) $530 $93

Helpful Tips for Buyers

  • If you want to keep it simple, cheap, and very compact for basic everyday photos with no fuss, Samsung’s SL30 is a time capsule worth a look. I’d call it a fun starter for kids or consultants needing very lightweight backup cams.

  • If you want usable raw files, manual controls, or intend to shoot action or travel photography, spend the extra on Canon’s G9 X II. It’s a camera that respects your skills and grows with your vision.

  • Never underestimate ergonomics and AF speed in using a camera often. You can have the best sensor in the world, but if the camera is frustrating to hold or focus, you’ll put it down fast.

Some Final Words from My Hands-On Testing Experience

Having put the Canon G9 X II through countless shooting sessions - from moody low-light portraits in cafes to landscape hikes and street candids - I appreciate its balance of portability and power. It’s far from a professional mirrorless, but it shines in scenarios where lugging bigger gear isn’t an option.

The Samsung SL30, a quirky blast from compact camera past, serves as a reminder of how fast camera tech evolves. It’s charmingly simple but really only shines in controlled, well-lit casual moments. For photography enthusiasts craving image control, detail, and speed, it’s more of a museum piece.

If you have to pick one under today’s photography demands and budget considerations, I strongly recommend the Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II for its excellent sensor, intuitive interface, solid image quality, and useful features across nearly all photography styles except hardcore professional workflows.

The Samsung SL30 remains a niche alternative for ultra-budget pocket snapping, but don’t expect it to keep pace with your photographic ambitions.

Happy shooting, and may your next compact camera fit your hands, style, and wallet just right!

Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon G9 X II and Samsung SL30
 Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark IISamsung SL30
General Information
Brand Name Canon Samsung
Model type Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II Samsung SL30
Also called - ES15
Class Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2017-01-04 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 7 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 13.2 x 8.8mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 116.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 5472 x 3648 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 12800 1600
Min native ISO 125 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-84mm (3.0x) 38-114mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/2-4.9 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing distance 5cm 5cm
Crop factor 2.7 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.5"
Resolution of display 1,040k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shooting rate 8.2fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, on, slow synchro, off Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 206 gr (0.45 lbs) 140 gr (0.31 lbs)
Physical dimensions 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 65 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.9 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 522 not tested
Other
Battery life 235 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $530 $93