Canon N Facebook ready vs Pentax WG-1
93 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Canon N Facebook ready vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-224mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 79 x 60 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2011
Photography Glossary Canon N Facebook ready vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Canon N Facebook ready vs Pentax WG-1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the N Facebook ready (12MP) and the WG-1 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe N Facebook ready was revealed 2 years after the WG-1 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the N Facebook ready grades vs the WG-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon N Facebook ready vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot N Facebook ready and Pentax Optio WG-1. The full galleries are available at Canon N Facebook ready Gallery and Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon N Facebook ready over the Pentax WG-1
| N Facebook ready | WG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2013 |  | February 2011 | Newer by 31 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.8" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.1") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Canon N Facebook ready
| WG-1 | N Facebook ready | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Canon N Facebook ready and Pentax WG-1
| N Facebook ready | WG-1 |
|---|
Canon N Facebook ready vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon N Facebook ready has got exterior measurements of 79mm x 60mm x 29mm (3.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-1 has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Canon N Facebook ready vs Pentax WG-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the N Facebook ready compared to the WG-1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the N Facebook ready and WG-1 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Canon N Facebook ready vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The image here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the N Facebook ready and WG-1.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Pentax WG-1 to give more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer N Facebook ready should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon N Facebook ready vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon N Facebook ready vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot N Facebook ready | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Pentax |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot N Facebook ready | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-08-22 | 2011-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 2248 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.8" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | PureColor II G touch | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 ( 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 195 gr (0.43 pounds) | 157 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 79 x 60 x 29mm (3.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | 260 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-9L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $299 | $350 |