Canon N Facebook ready vs Ricoh CX3
93 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Canon N Facebook ready vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-224mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 79 x 60 x 29mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon N Facebook ready vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Canon N Facebook ready vs Ricoh CX3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the N Facebook ready (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe N Facebook ready was revealed 3 years later than the CX3 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the N Facebook ready matches up versus the CX3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon N Facebook ready vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot N Facebook ready & Ricoh CX3. The full galleries are viewable at Canon N Facebook ready Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon N Facebook ready over the Ricoh CX3
| N Facebook ready | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2013 | June 2010 | More recent by 39 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Canon N Facebook ready
| CX3 | N Facebook ready | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon N Facebook ready and Ricoh CX3
| N Facebook ready | CX3 |
|---|
Canon N Facebook ready vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon N Facebook ready has got exterior dimensions of 79mm x 60mm x 29mm (3.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon N Facebook ready vs Ricoh CX3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the N Facebook ready compared to the CX3.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the N Facebook ready and CX3 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Canon N Facebook ready vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the N Facebook ready and CX3.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Canon N Facebook ready to produce more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer N Facebook ready should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon N Facebook ready vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon N Facebook ready vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot N Facebook ready | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot N Facebook ready | Ricoh CX3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-08-22 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 2248 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II G touch | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 ( 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195g (0.43 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 79 x 60 x 29mm (3.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-9L | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $299 | $329 |