Canon S100 vs Nikon S9300
93 Imaging
36 Features
48 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Canon S100 vs Nikon S9300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 198g - 99 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced December 2011
- Older Model is Canon S95
- Replacement is Canon S110
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Revealed July 2012
- Old Model is Nikon S9100
- New Model is Nikon S9500
Photography Glossary Canon S100 vs Nikon S9300: Compact Cameras Tailored for Enthusiasts and Travelers
When it comes to compact cameras, the 2010s saw a strong push toward blending portability with solid image quality and versatile zoom capability. Two noteworthy contenders that still hold relevance are the Canon PowerShot S100 and the Nikon Coolpix S9300. Though somewhat modest by today’s standards, these cameras have intrigued photographers who prioritize pocketable designs but want more creative control and zoom reach than smartphones can offer.
We’ve spent extensive time with both models, putting their specs and features through real-world scenarios across multiple photography disciplines. This comprehensive comparison will guide you through their inner workings and help you decide which one aligns best with your creative intentions.

First Impressions: The Bodies You Will Hold
Both cameras boast compact builds that appeal to street shooters, travelers, and casual photographers seeking easy-to-carry gear.
-
Canon S100:
- Slightly smaller and lighter at 99 x 60 x 28 mm and 198g
- Simple, sleek metal chassis with a fixed lens and modest grip
- A traditional compact design without any pronounced buttons - yet offers manual control modes that you’d expect from enthusiast-level compacts
-
Nikon S9300:
- A bit bulkier at 109 x 62 x 31 mm and 215g
- Design includes a more pronounced lens barrel to accommodate the expansive zoom range
- Larger footprint makes it feel secure in hand but less pocket-friendly than the Canon
Ergonomically, the Canon’s restrained size and lighter weight make it easier for all-day handheld shooting, especially for street and travel photography. However, Nikon’s slightly bigger frame accommodates a longer zoom lens, which we will dissect later.
You can get a clear side-by-side visual of their proportions here:

The Canon preserves a classic control layout with dedicated dials for exposure modes and a standard four-way controller. The Nikon, lacking manual exposure controls – which may deter more experienced photographers – opts for a simplified layout aimed at point-and-shoot ease. The interface choices manifest Nikon’s more consumer-friendly ethos, while Canon leans towards enthusiasts wanting some creative freedom.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera
The sensor dictates much of the ultimate image quality. Here’s where things get interesting, as these cameras operate with very different sensor sizes and resolutions.
| Specification | Canon S100 | Nikon S9300 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | 1/1.7” CMOS | 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor Dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58 mm | 6.17 x 4.55 mm |
| Sensor Area | 41.5 mm² | 28.1 mm² |
| Resolution | 12 MP (4000 x 3000 px) | 16 MP (4608 x 3456 px) |
| Max Native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |

What this means in practice:
- Canon’s larger 1/1.7" sensor provides bigger pixels, which generally enhances low-light sensitivity, dynamic range, and overall image quality.
- Nikon’s sensor is smaller but has a higher pixel count, packing 16MP into less area. This can increase noise levels and reduce dynamic range - particularly in shadows and highlights. The back-illuminated (BSI) design of Nikon’s sensor helps regain some light sensitivity, but it does not fully compensate for the size disadvantage.
Through hands-on photography tests:
- Canon’s 12MP sensor delivered punchy colors, better control of noise at higher ISOs (up to ISO 800 feels quite clean), and less banding.
- Nikon’s 16MP sensor produced sharper details at base ISO but got noisier more quickly as ISO increased beyond 400 – limiting its usability in dimly lit scenes or night photography.
For landscape photographers and anyone after wide tonal gradations, Canon’s sensor shines thanks to its superior dynamic range (DxOmarks rate it at 11.6 EV vs Nikon’s untested, but predictably lower). Meanwhile, Nikon’s camera excels more in well-lit daytime shooting where pixel density improves fine detail reproduction, particularly useful for cropping.
Lens and Zoom: Creativity Through Optics
The focal length and aperture define how flexible a camera is in various shooting conditions. Here’s a direct comparison:
| Feature | Canon S100 | Nikon S9300 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length (35mm Eq) | 24-120 mm (5x optical zoom) | 25-450 mm (18x optical zoom) |
| Max Aperture | f/2.0 - f/5.9 | f/3.5 - f/5.9 |
| Macro Focusing Range | 3 cm | 4 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
The Canon S100’s bright f/2.0 aperture at wide-angle allows superior low-light capability and stronger background blur – a decisive advantage for portrait and artistic photography (particularly if you want that creamy bokeh). The 5x zoom range is modest but sufficient for everyday shooting, street scenes, and moderate telephoto.
Meanwhile, the Nikon S9300’s superzoom range of 18x (25-450 mm) is formidable. It equips you for wildlife and distant subjects where reach is paramount. The trade-off is the slower f/3.5 aperture at wide and equivalent f/5.9 telephoto, meaning you’ll need more light or higher ISOs to maintain shutter speeds.
In practical use:
- Canon’s lens excels in low-light performance, indoors, or portraits where wide apertures help separate subjects from busy backgrounds.
- Nikon’s telephoto length makes it ideal for travel and wildlife enthusiasts who want to capture distant scenes without packing heavy lenses or gear.
You’ll find this lens length difference crucial in your creative decisions depending on what you shoot most.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking Your Subjects
Autofocus performance can make or break your ability to capture fleeting moments. Here’s how these two cameras stack up:
| Feature | Canon S100 | Nikon S9300 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | Contrast-detection, 9 points | Contrast-detection, unknown points |
| Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
| Continuous Shooting | 2.0 fps | 6.9 fps |
| AF Tracking | Yes | Yes |
Canon’s autofocus is contrast-based with 9 selectable points. It offers face detection and AF tracking but operates relatively slowly. Continuous shooting is capped at 2 frames per second, limiting action or sports photography potential.
Nikon, interestingly, pumps out nearly 7 fps burst rate, making it more capable at tracking subjects in action. However, the AF system is contrast-based with unspecified points and lacks manual focus control, reducing precision in tricky situations. Face detection and tracking complement this nicely but are less tailored for fast, complex tracking.
If you frequently shoot sports or wildlife needing fast responsivity, Nikon’s speed advantage is noteworthy. For portraits and landscapes where deliberate framing is fine, Canon’s AF system suffices, especially thanks to manual focus override.
Build Quality and Handling
Neither camera offers environmental sealing, waterproofing, or shockproofing, so treat them as standard compacts that require some care in adverse conditions.
The Canon’s metal body lends a more premium feel, with controls suitable for photographers accustomed to manual exposure - shutter and aperture priority modes, and exposure compensation. Nikon’s design opts for simpler operation, lacking manual exposure modes, which may frustrate enthusiasts preferring creative control.
Both feature fixed 3-inch LCD screens - but Nikon’s screen boasts a higher resolution and an anti-reflection coating, improving outdoor visibility and framing accuracy.

Video Capabilities: Basic but Useful
Both cameras can shoot Full HD 1080p video:
| Feature | Canon S100 | Nikon S9300 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution/Frame | 1920 x 1080 @ 24fps | 1920 x 1080 @ 30fps |
| Video Format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone Port | No | No |
| Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
Canon shoots at 24 fps offering a filmic look, favored by videographers seeking natural motion. Nikon records at 30 fps, which results in smoother video but slightly less cinematic. The lack of microphone input on both limits use for pro-level audio capture.
Image stabilization enhances handheld video, and both cameras perform similarly here.
Battery Life and Storage
Each camera uses proprietary rechargeable batteries:
- Canon S100’s NB-5L offers around 200 shots per charge
- Nikon S9300’s EN-EL12 also approximates 200 shots per charge
Both cameras accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards and have single card slots.
While battery life isn’t standout for either, it’s sufficient for casual shooting. For extended use, carrying a spare battery is recommended.
Connectivity and Extras
Canon S100 includes built-in GPS and Eye-Fi Wi-Fi card compatibility for wireless image transfer. Nikon S9300 lacks any wireless connectivity but offers built-in GPS for geotagging.
USB and HDMI ports are present on both, with USB 2.0 speeds. None support modern wireless standards like Bluetooth or NFC.
Real-World Performance with Sample Images
Comparing sample images side-by-side illustrates differences:
- Canon’s photos exhibit richer colors, better shadow detail, and smoother skin tones in portraits.
- Nikon’s captures show more reach and detail when zoomed but slightly harsher noise and less dynamic range.
- Both render reasonable image quality at base ISO in good light, but Canon maintains visual quality better in dim scenarios.
Suitability by Photography Genre
Let’s break down which kind of photographer each camera suits best.
| Photography Type | Canon S100 | Nikon S9300 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Excellent skin tones, bokeh | Adequate but slower aperture limits |
| Landscape | Strong dynamic range, wide lens | Longer zoom for distant subjects |
| Wildlife | Limited zoom, slower AF | 18x zoom and faster burst rate |
| Sports | Slow continuous shooting | Faster burst aids capturing action |
| Street | Compact, discreet, manual control | Slightly bulkier, easy zoom |
| Macro | Very close focusing (3 cm) | Close but less ideal (4 cm) |
| Night/Astro | Higher max ISO, longer exposures | Limited by smaller sensor |
| Video | 1080p at 24fps, optical IS | 1080p at 30fps, optical IS |
| Travel | Compact, versatile lens, GPS | Longer reach, GPS but larger size |
| Professional Work | RAW support, manual exposure | No RAW, no manual control |
For professionals who want editing flexibility, Canon’s RAW shooting and manual modes make it the superior creative tool. Nikon targets casual users who prioritize zoom and burst capabilities over control.
Summary: Which Should You Choose?
Canon PowerShot S100 – An Expert’s Compact
Recommended if you:
- Prioritize image quality, especially in low light and portraits
- Value manual exposure modes and RAW output
- Want a small, lightweight camera for street and travel photography
- Appreciate color accuracy and dynamic range over zoom reach
Strengths:
- Larger sensor with better ISO performance
- Bright f/2.0 aperture lens for artistic depth of field
- Manual controls and RAW file support
- GPS and Eye-Fi compatibility for geotagging and wireless transfer
Limitations:
- Limited zoom range (5x) for wildlife or distant subjects
- Slow continuous shooting not suited to sports/action
- No touchscreen or electronic viewfinder
Nikon Coolpix S9300 – Zoom and Speed Enthusiast
Recommended if you:
- Need a powerful zoom for wildlife or travel photography
- Want faster continuous shooting for capturing action
- Prefer a straightforward point-and-shoot interface
- Have a budget-conscious mindset (typically priced lower than Canon S100)
Strengths:
- 18x extensive optical zoom with image stabilization
- Faster burst rate for tracking moving subjects
- Higher resolution 16MP sensor for detailed images in good light
- Higher resolution LCD with anti-reflective coating
Limitations:
- Smaller sensor leads to noisier images at higher ISO
- No manual exposure modes or RAW support
- Heavier and slightly bulkier
- No wireless connectivity
Final Thoughts
For photographers seeking a compact camera that feels like a true creative tool – the Canon PowerShot S100 remains a strong contender. Its balance of image quality, manual controls, and portability empowers you to grow your skills across genres from portraits to night photography.
On the other hand, if zoom reach and shooting speed are your top priorities, and simplicity is desired over full control, the Nikon Coolpix S9300 offers an extended lens range and faster continuous shooting that can capture moments you’d otherwise miss.
Both cameras can serve as reliable companions for enthusiasts wanting more than smartphone imagery, but knowing your primary photography interests will guide the best match.
We encourage you to handle both if possible, check out sample galleries online, and consider what styles and scenarios excite you most. Investing in the right camera lays a foundation for your creative journey that you’ll appreciate with every shot.
Ready to explore compact photography further? Consider pairing either camera with extra batteries, quality memory cards, and a sturdy travel case to maximize your shooting enjoyment.
Happy shooting!
Canon S100 vs Nikon S9300 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S100 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Nikon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S100 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-12-22 | 2012-07-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 6.9 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps), 320 x 240 (240, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 198g (0.44 lbs) | 215g (0.47 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 60 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 50 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.6 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 pictures | 200 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $429 | $249 |