Canon S100 vs Ricoh WG-4
93 Imaging
36 Features
48 Overall
40
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon S100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 198g - 99 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched December 2011
- Replaced the Canon S95
- Refreshed by Canon S110
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon S100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Canon S100 vs Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the S100 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the S100 (1/1.7") and WG-4 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe S100 was manufactured 3 years prior to the WG-4 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the S100 matches up vs the WG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon S100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S100 & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are available at Canon S100 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S100 over the Ricoh WG-4
| S100 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Canon S100
| WG-4 | S100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | December 2011 | Fresher by 25 months |
Common features in the Canon S100 and Ricoh WG-4
| S100 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Canon S100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon S100 enjoys physical measurements of 99mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Canon S100 vs Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the S100 compared to the WG-4.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S100 and WG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon S100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The photograph here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S100 and WG-4.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The S100 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 will render more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older S100 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Canon S100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon S100 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S100 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S100 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-12-22 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps), 320 x 240 (240, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 198g (0.44 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 60 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 50 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.6 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | 240 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-5L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $429 | $330 |